Who in their prime was the greatest out of these top crusierweights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FLINT ISLAND, Jan 10, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,463
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    Yeah, but that was the only time he was beat at CW, vs. a HOF like Toney, and sorry for my arrogance, but based on the scandals years later, I don't think Toney did it without illegal substances. It's just my opinion, but that kind of performance almost out of nowhere, having two steroid scandals later in his career is at least very suspicious.

    BTW, Toney's CW resume starts and ends with Jirov. No way he's up there on a best of list.

    Jirov beats Haye rather easy IMO, as well as Holyfield and Gomez. No shame in that, Haye is pretty damn good, but all 3 had the natural talent to use David's weaknesses against him, and neither were easy to hit with a haymaker. Haye doesn't match on the defensive, punch output, stamina and chin side. There's a significant advantage for them in those areas.
     
  2. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,170
    906
    Jun 23, 2007
    1. Gomez

    2. Toney

    3. Jirov

    4. Haye
     
  3. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
  4. FLINT ISLAND

    FLINT ISLAND PENYRHEOL Full Member

    8,568
    8
    May 4, 2008
    Toney seems a popular choice
     
  5. Simple100

    Simple100 Active Member Full Member

    1,329
    0
    Apr 10, 2008
    1. evander
    2. tony
     
  6. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    ot but i think holyfield. i remember he was really a cruiserweight and real tough one at that. he was sort of bloated heavyweight, he was usually smaller in his fights against the true heavies except iron mike.
     
  7. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    Besides Holy, JCGomez
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.