It's not debatable at all. Does Brook and Thurman beat Bradley? Probably. Have they? no. You can't rank fighters based on potential.
Its quite simple to work out really.flyweight to lmw is a bigger jump than both no matter which way you slice it
That is so unusual for a fighter with an all out attacking style who has fought the elite thru 8 weight classes for years on end.he must be garbage
Lineal bull****.the belts mean fck all in reality.but of every weightclass he went through he was undisputably the best in it
Its not bait at all.its just a reality check to the disrespect the guy gets on here when he was an absolute phenomenon. Floyd has everyone hangin off his dikk because of his false zero. Ppl turn a blind eye to the fact floyd was cauggt red handed using iv,derailed tge fight every way he could for 5 years when it wouls have been relevant and the fact that hes naturally a full weight division at least bigger than pac plus had everything possible stacked in his favour b4 hed agree to fight. Wake up.the fighter of the generation is far and away pac man 😆
Manny Pacquiao. His career spun over 10 weight classes. Titles are not necessarily as important as the opponents themselves. Manny Pacquiao yet stands alone as the only Lineal Flyweight Champion to have become an ATG Welterweight and had won a belt in dominating fashion against an elite, oversized fighter in Antonio Margarito. He is a human anomaly.
I think its worth discerning between classic/traditional weght divisions and new divisions. So for instance Floyd has held 5 divisions titles at different times but only 2 classic divisions titles, so one can compare him to old timers acheivements fairly. Similarly - Manny has held titles in 5 classic divisions David Haye has held a title in one classic division. Shane Mosley has held 2 titles in 2 classic divisions ODLH has managed 3 titles in different classic divisions Cowardzaghe has not managed to hold or defend any titles at all in classic divisions in his 11 year career.