Who In Your Opinion Was The Greatest LHW Of All Time?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Frazier Hook, Dec 24, 2009.


  1. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Ezzard Charles for me.
     
  2. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Archie Moore, even though he did lose to Charles three times.
     
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    You may as well drop Moore right now because we know for sure he finishes behind Charles.

    My guess is that it would maybe come down to Tunney & Charles (tho decent footage would help)
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney/Charles ,but Sam Langford should get a shout here too.
     
  5. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    578
    Nov 5, 2009
    i voted 'other' only because i couldnt seperate you top 3 plus conn and foster. The l/heavys to me is probabley the hardest to pick as i think they are too hard to pick one supreme fighter
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Jones Jr. shouldn't be on that list.

    Yea, Hill often get's overlooked and I like him very much. A very nice and humble human beeing :good Also he is the third best lhw of the 90s I'd say just short of Michalchewski and Jones but not by that much. He deserves to be included into the HoF.

    But:
    Amateur achievements should not count when judging the pro career of a fighter.
    Maske won in 2007 and clearly. The fight was a stinker but Maske made Hill fight his fight, controlled the pace and flow of the fight, landed the cleaner and harder punches and showed the better defence. Hill threw more but landed less. How anybody could have this fight for Hill really amazes me.

    Sorry but Jones did not dominate the weightclass. He was the number one contender of the linear champ who was DM but never made that fight happen - and if he wanted the fight would have happened. The only fighters of note at the time he beat them are Hill, who just came of a loss to DM and Tarver, who's only claim to fame is basically beating Jones. All the other guys were either far past their prime and/or far removed from their best weight, never has beens or just average.
    Jones at lhw get's very overated. He should be top15 but nothing more.


    To the topic:
    I rank Charles, Moore and Foster alongside each other in my tier one. If I would have to decide I'd pick Charles as numero uno.
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,557
    Jul 28, 2004
    Though I can think of others that would have concievably beat him in a matchup, I choose Ezzard Charles as the best overall.
     
  10. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    371
    Dec 30, 2005
  11. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    I voted for Charles. I almost voted for Spinks but I have to admit to being biased towards fighters who fought 100 to 200 + fights versus guys who fought 30 odd fights (despite that being my era). I think H2H Spinks would be a very tough out for any of these guys.
     
  12. wellsini

    wellsini Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,266
    16
    Jul 6, 2009


    He ****ing took Dick Tigers face off him as well:bbb
     
  13. junior-soprano

    junior-soprano Active Member Full Member

    1,174
    7
    Aug 1, 2009
    archie moore. but i can live with the fact if someone says charles. all the rest is bullsh..
    BTW merry christmas evrryone