Who is a greater pugilist Mosley,Oscar or Tito

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nigel_Benn, Jun 10, 2008.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Against a superior boxer like De La Hoya, then yes.

    But it wasn't like Trinidad had limited skills and was just a pure slugger.
     
  2. bigtime-skills

    bigtime-skills Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,540
    102
    Apr 20, 2007
    The thread said NO market value?
    With DLH, I just don't get it:patsch

    .........he beat Vargas (after Tito detonated him)
    .........he beat Ike Quartey (very good win)

    What other memorable moment of DLH do we have? EVERY other "big fight" he was in was some "excuse"

    Tito - my trainer made me stop fighting:rofl
    Hopkins - very suspect liver shot, not saying it didn't happen, but definitely didn't appear he went out on his shield.
    Mayweather - picked a "smaller" guy and couldn't impose his will on em. excuses were that he stopped jabbing after 6 rounds....6 ROUNDS people:patsch
     
  3. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    I don't think that either. I just think had Mosley fought him he wouldn't have been dumb enough to go toe to toe either.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I don't even think he beat Quartey. I think he won the Trinidad fight narrowly and drew with Whitaker.

    De La Hoya had solid wins over guys like Hernandez, Ruelas, Gonzalez, Molina, Rivera, Chavez, etc...

    Yeah a lot of them were smaller and past their primes, but let's not act like Mosley's opposition at 135 was something special. Or Trinidad for most of 147. Besides Carr and Campas, most of his opposition was weak pre-1999.
     
  5. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Oscar never gave an excuse against Floyd. He said his jab didn't fail him, he failed his jab. Then he said he had to think about fighting the young champs before he resumes fighting. Oscar was very honest about that fight. Smaller guy is no excuse when floyd happens to be the best boxer on the planet with the best defence in recent history with pin point accuracy and timing.
     
  6. bigtime-skills

    bigtime-skills Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,540
    102
    Apr 20, 2007
    GREAT point champ, but even these 2 guys Oscar fought YEARS after Tito took their "0" in the lost column.

    I'm not bashing Oscar, he's a great fighter, but deceiving at the same time, and excuses or not he's 0-3 against the people he's being compared to in this thread.....
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Mosley may have tried to box him, but I don't think he had the ability to box Trinidad as successfully as DLH did for the majority of the fight, and Hopkins did.

    Mosley had marvelous physical gifts, and it's not like he lacks skills either, but I think his physical gifts in large part masked (or made people forget about) some of his flaws. He pawed very often with his jab. He winged a lot of shots that left him open down the middle. DLH had nice parrying skills and a more solid all around skill set than Mosley, IMO. Hopkins, well, he's just a mastermind in there.

    They never fought so it'll never be known, but I'm just not sure if Mosley had the ability to box Trinidad successfully like some others did. He doesn't really seem like that type of fighter, he's more of a speedy slugger.
     
  8. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    tough post to answer.

    mosley's got fast hands but lacks footwork, tito's always been outboxed by technically better fighters, oscar's got the high profile on his side and the fact that big fights come to him and so his resume will always beat both the other's combined.

    i'll take the easy option and say that, because all three were 'flawed', they are simply hall of famers who will never be remembered as great fighters.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Is that an excuse, or just a (non) explanation?

    "It wasn't the night of the jab".

    :huh

    DLH did later try to blame it on injuries though.

    You left out the "bad oysters" excuse.
     
  10. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    If not these three in their close weight classes, then who were the ATG's of that generation?
     
  11. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
  12. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    nope trinidad power smarts and no steroids. not to mention beating odh
     
  13. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I think Mosley had more raw talent than either of them, and I rate him very highly head to head, but his resume doesn't reflect this, and I don't think it's quite as good as Tito's or Hoya's. I think he could have accomplished much more, he was just unlucky enough to have his career seriously derailed twice.
     
  14. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    felix doesn't have smarts.

    he's ahead hunter like tszyu was and fell into that trap because it worked on lesser opponents.
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    No he wasn't. Trinidad was a very good body puncher who stopped, dropped, or hurt numerous guys to the body.

    Tszyu was a good boxer who could go to the body effectively too.