Are you for real giving Sun as a reliable source????? And who is making stuffs exactly??? The QUOTE from Hearn is before AJ and his management agency 258 accepted the offer. 258MGT did an interview and said this was take it or leave it offer, no negotiation. You are posting 1 month old news, yeah you are fake, instead of wasting my time and embarrasing yourself check the timeline first. Fee, rematch, split, date, venue are all agreed. The main problem is about the commercial and AJ rights that he is earning big $ from them.
Your still making stuff up no1 JDS the link I posted is from last week Tuesday 27th September not even a week old,the very same day you posted this thread [url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/fury-finally-has-bren-exposed.693240/[/url] LOL Everyone on here knows who is fake and who distorts everything to suit there own agenda and is the one embarrassing themselves as soon as Fury is mentioned .
As you can see in the poll result, most people are not so easily fooled by the big-mouthed dosser Tyson Fairy.
I’m not interested in the poll for a start it’s only peoples opinions,what I am interested in is that you posted that I had made something up that I had posted on a thread,basically acccusing me of being a liar on an open forum so I posted the link to it and you don’t even have the decency to admit you got it wrong. That tells me everything I need to know about you .
You did. What the linked article actually reads: "But negotiations were progressing nicely for a December 3 bout, before Fury set a deadline of 5pm on September 26. Fury then declared the fight was dead in the water." AJ's promoter Eddie Hearn confirmed that they have accepted the offer after thrashing out talks with Frank Warren's son George Hearn said: "We just went back this morning and said, I spoke to AJ about that offer, we think, I think particularly he deserves more than 40 per cent." This content is protected
every day you been saying the main problem is Fury doesn't want it. now, it's " err ... but but .. derrr ... commercial rights" probably because ..... EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIEDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE EDDIE SAID !!!!!!!!!!! right?
Can you use your brain pls??? For 100th times. You arr quoting Sun the most unreliable paper/media of them all. They sum up all the talk, from thw beginning. That's not new. This part was agreed 2-e weeks ago, how hard is it to get it????? Hearn stated in a interview tgat AJ told him to not negotiate anything and accept the offer. Hearn said i wanted to negotiate a bit about the sate and the rematch aplit, but AJ shut him down. Educate yourself, from AJ management. This content is protected Your original statement was that AJ wanted more in the rematch and that's why the fight is not made, which ia b. c., cause that part was agreed long time ago, and never ever was a problem, and neither Hearn or Warren even have say anything about that, after the contract was send. That was never a problem, get it??? You are spreading false Information cause you have no idea what's going on and not followes the timeline.
clear as day Eddie Hearn has every intention of stringing out negotiations & simultaneously whispering in AJ's ear telling him he has better plans for him it's been clear for a while now
Fury fans are so low. He doesn't follow the event and bring info from Sun of them all, that summed all the talk from the beginning. They have moved from that and agreed all the demands by Fury long time ago. But he is fraud and doesn't have idea what he is even talking about.
Because I think AJ poses more physical problems than Usyk. I think Fury still wins but it will be an ugly fight.
Usyk clearly wants the fight and realises making Deontay look stupid in the ring might be his best path to getting the Fury fight. How long do contracts of this type take to get signed? I suspect Fury didn't give the lawyers enough time to agree. How many times has Fury unretired? Blatantly obvious Fury is a complete nutter and has involved in this type of thing before with AJ.