Bradley and it's not even close. Collazo did good vs Berto and Hatton in their primes when both were undefeated, an impressive feat coming from a fighter of Collazo's caliber. Bradley is much more versatile and a much higher caliber than Collazo. He outboxed Dinamita ffs. You have to be one of the best boxers in the world in order to do that, only Floyd was able to do it before, John and Norwood were given gift decisions and clearly beaten in the championship rounds, the rounds that should have made the difference in closely contested fights up to that point. Collazo at no point in his career would have been able to do that.
Bradley has had a better career than Collazo, so I picked Bradley. if they fought when both were at their peak i'm not sure Bradley beats him in a h2h match up...
i'm not saying you are wrong for saying Bradley is a higher caliber BUT come on now, Bradley outboxed a FORTY yr old war ridden jmm. that's just a stupid way to pump up Bradley and that fight was WAY closer than people claim. he didn't come close to schooling him like Floyd had, not remotely close. there really was lots of even rounds in tim v jmm but judges are pushed to try to find a way to have a winner in each round. for some stupid reason they frown upon even rounds. I think a even round should be even, finding a way to give rounds to a fighter (when its clearly even) is as dumb as can be. that's why they should of kept uneven amount of rounds. finding a way to gift a fighter (either fighter) a round is just stupid and really bad practice in my book. if neither fighter claimed a given round WHY do you have to pick which style or name you like more to give the 10 to
Collazo was a pretty damn good fighter when he was close to his best. I know you cant pick up the different talent fighters have. all you can do is look up fighters records and see who beat the bigger name
not really. look at floyds resume. he cherrypicks opponents and forbids them to wear their type of gloves and all.
Actually his best win, is against Jose Antonio Rivera. :good I'm not too high on Bradley and respect Collazo's work ethic, but Bradley would have minimal trouble vs. Collazo h2h.
wait a second, you have to think Bradley is terrible because you say a totally shot pac fought him in the 1st fight so a even more shot (how was he walking) pac fought him the 2nd fight. in my book pac beat him clearly both times so can Bradley beat anyone if completely shot fighters beat him easily ?