Who is better in your books?? Haye or brunO?

heh heh heh

 

Evryone in uk knows who bruno is!

Man is a legend in these parts?!

Haye?! Who Tw fuxk is gaye?

 

Lets put it this way Bruno beats all of the bums Haye beat at heavweight much quicker and he doesnt fight Fraudley 'bless up' Harrison.

Remember Bruno was ahead on points against Lennox.

Great jab.

 

It is doubtful.

Actually I would not be surprised to see Sugar Niko stopping Bruno late.:yep

He was just so erratic fighter.

 

George Chuvalo, now I get it... Bubby is a moose-****er! So after all your trolling it turns out you come from Canada, a country that has had the grand total of one Heavyweight boxing champion... born in 1881 :rofl:rofl:rofl.

Just like the other Klitschko troll, Champion, from Australia - a country that is even more pathetic than Canada with zero Heavyweight champions - you have no place trolling a country like England. :hi:

 

Haye would knock Bruno out man.

 

Bruno was a horrible fighter to watch because you couldn't help but like the guy which meant it was painful to watch him because he could have pounded a guy for 11 rounds but you always knew it only took an average puncher to put him on ***** Street.Even boxing commentators of the time always knew that any HW with reasonable ability could sparkle him.He was viewed like Tim Henman in that no one honestly expected him to pull off the really big wins.He had an admirable career but he was never truly viewed as a great HW.
Maybe it's the level of opposition but Haye did get people talking about the division again and many people believed he had the tools to get at the Klitschkos.
Frank was always the likeable bridesmaid.Even 'Arry knew it.

 

Hahahahaha

 

David Tua's 19 second KO victim "John Ruiz" :yep

 

Didn't Haye have a successful defence?:think

 

:smoke

Frank Bruno and Fraudley Harrison are very similar...

although Bruno's chin was even worse...

Bruno's claim to fame was beating washed up fighters and
getting KTFO every time he stepped up...

 

However likeable he was,every boxing writer and fan knew he was an accident waiting to happen.He had good ability,but when he went into a big fight you always watched through your fingers.Whatever Haye may have made a balls of,he was someone who was seen by most as the fighter who could breathe life into the division.
People might say otherwise,but most of us would love to see Haye come back and have another go.Whether you like him or not.
Bruno was a character.Haye was a contender.

 

Haye is clearly the more athletic fighter but for all his talent he is a flawed fighter at heavyweight. His work rate is very low and he really only fights in spurts and is clearly based upon his performance against Wlad ineffective at applying pressure.

Bruno hits harder than Haye and also has by far the superior jab and work rate. And Bruno's biggest weakness, his chin is still better than Haye's though Haye is more elusive.

Bruno is a much more proven quantity at heavyweight having fought at the highest level repeatedly. Bruno at his best was able to out box Lewis, something I can't imagine Haye ever doing. I see Bruno KOing Haye without too much difficulty.

 

OK.
What I meant was;didn't Haye MAKE a successful defence?