who is better. Marco antonio barrera or chico corrales.

I agree as well..:good

 

The minority is growing!

 

Barrera and not even close you have to be re****ed to even compare them.

 

Chicoe was definitely the all around, better fighter. His career was unfortunately cut short.

 

:huh:-patsch

 

you must be a pacturd, huh?:think

 

Corrales would win head-to-head but Barrera easily had the better carreer and is ranked higher.

 

Im a pac**** because I see an ATG vs a random belt champion??? Really?

You might as-well compare Ali to corrales its almost the same thing.

 

He had little to nothing left when tragedy struck. We usually agree more often than not but it can't happen every time. Personally I think it would have been a hell of a fight at 130 when Chico was at his peak.

 

This forum going more and more re****ed each day. Doubt most of you are even boxing fans.

 

Calm yourself, mate.

 

Why? Because we have a different opinion than you? lol

 

you do realise this is a floyd vs pac thread dont you? i honestly think if floyd beat MAB and Pac beat chico pacturds would be saying chico was the better win...atsch

 

Im not questioning the tragedy and was sad when it happened but MAB is a shoe in for the boxing hall of fame. I think Chico was a very very good fighter MAB is a great fighter.

 

Seriously, I haven't been here long but it's not the difference of opinions that ruins discussion. It's the people who have a conniption every time someone says something they don't agree with.