who is better. Marco antonio barrera or chico corrales.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr. STRUGG, Apr 9, 2015.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,707
    29,247
    Feb 25, 2015
    That 1 guy who voted Corrales? Who was he???? LMAO.
     
  2. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Naseem style is very sloppy which he leaves himself open all the time which he always puts his hands down. And plus i believe barrera was a alittle bigger then the prince? Corrales doesnt fight very sloppy like prince does in a stance. Barrera didnt destroy hamed though i mean seriously stop bsing.
     
  3. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,584
    0
    Mar 17, 2015
    Naaaah im sure barrera can outhustle outbox chico.

    im talking about p4p punching power. nassem is close to chicos power.
     
  4. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,584
    0
    Mar 17, 2015
    I know. So nice that the poll is public so we know whos who:lol::lol:
     
  5. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Barrera was bullying Prince in most of that fight especially that 12th round but guess what? Would barrera be able to bully Corrales? Think about it.
     
  6. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,584
    0
    Mar 17, 2015
    fair point. I still think a great fighter like MAB can win against a bigger good fighter than chico at 130.
    But remember its MAB 3rd division and chicos 1st division.
     
  7. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006

    Yeah it's close and so? Look at the size differents between prince and corrales? lol i mean really? lol. You think i mean really think if barrera can outbox prince that he wouldve outbox Corrales? What have you been smoking? lol.
     
  8. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    There you go which it means advantage prime corrales. Barrera best weight was at 122, 126 pounds.
     
  9. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,584
    0
    Mar 17, 2015
    No matter how you slice it Barrera >>>> coralles. stop already. go vote for chico if you like.
     
  10. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    MAB would have stopped the severely weight drained Corrales that Floyd fought. People forget how drained Corrales was for that fight. Pac's first 2 losses came as a result of him missing weight and getting dropped in both fights from being weight drained. Chico ballooned up 16lbs from 130lb... Heck he had to spend some time in the sauna to make weight.

    I love how these *****s keep bringing up Oscar weight drain to descredit the win, but Chico was even more weight drained. Oscar just lost too much weight during camp so he couldnt gain much more, probably lost muscle too. Chico had to rehydrate 16lbs, shows you how much he had to DRAIN to make 130lb. Shown by his punch resistance.
     
  11. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006

    And yet after facing floyd, corrales fought casa twice at what weight? Oh yeah 130 pounds lol. Has barrera even show he look like a prime fighter at 130 pounds? Umm nooo. Barrera best weight is at 122. 126 pounds. Oscar moving down to 147 for the first time in over 8 years is way way way way different then you saying corrales was weight drain. Corrales was prime and oscar sure as hell wasnt.
     
  12. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010

    2 votes now, probably same person. :D
     
  13. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    What??? lmfao. Corrales was more drain then Oscar when oscar move back down to 147 pounds? Please tell me you are joking?
     
  14. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    You could be right. There's something to be said about a good big man beating a good small man. I just consider MAB a notch higher in terms of ability. Maybe overcoming size advantages Diego would have enjoyed had the two faced off in their respective primes.
     
  15. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,707
    29,247
    Feb 25, 2015
    Come on this rayhogan guy cannot be serious. MAB beat Erik Morales twice. That alone is enough.

    We shouldn't even have to justify this BS. He's completely nonsensical.