Who is better skillwise: Andre Dirrell or Chad Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by herbzg, Mar 28, 2010.


  1. luciuslim

    luciuslim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,313
    0
    Jul 16, 2009
    dawson much more technically sound
    dirrell faster and a harder puncher
     
  2. flem1

    flem1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,934
    75
    Mar 18, 2006
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
  4. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005
    Dirrell is faster and a harder hitter but also is more straight up and down. Dawson is more fluid and has a wider, more balance base, so he can fight the way Dirrell did against Abraham without putting himself in danger.

    Dawson is 27 years old and has five wins over top five opponents. His bout against Pascal will be his fifth consecutive against an opponent ranked in the top five.

    Chad has his flaws, too, but he's one of the most criminally under-appreciated fighters in the sport.
     
  5. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    both skilled fighters,but neither will ever capture the general boxing fans attention.as they lack the warrior instinct.
     
  6. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    I dont think people underrate him. He is good, and would probably beat Dirrell right now. He is just so goofy and ridiculous that people have no interest in seeing him.

    Dirrell has a million times higher upside if he continues his development. And I believe he will beat Dawson clearly and easily in a couple of years.
     
  7. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Dawson and it isnt even close. Dirrell is extremely gifted with speed and reflexes but when it comes to SKILLS he's very sloppy and amatuerish. Dawson on the other hand isnt.