Who's better H2H and Legacy. My vote is Vitali on both. H2H few would debate too much; it would be a brutal bout, but VK would take the fight to Wlad and Wlad would fold first. Legacy is more debatable, Wlad beat more guys, but Vitali lost less and when he lost, lost better, and his top couple wins were better than Wlad's top couple wins.
h2h anyone who can come at wlad better than retired failed near 40 fattie can stop him with ease in seconds, so vitali tops that. resume wise vitali tend to hide away from good opps after getting stopped a few times early in his career. Therefore I'd say young vits >> young wlad but older wlad >older vits
Wlad is actually the better boxer, but Vitali is a better fighter which mean he is much the better H2H and legacy wise.
ahh if only you could splice their genes together and create a hybrid of both in one body, Vitamir Klitchsko, what would you have? wlads defensive skills plus vitalis tough chin?
This is a klit turd thread so can all demographic losers leave and go jack off in a MVC thread or something
Vitali is nowhere near Wlad resume wise. That said, Vitali > Wlad H2H. Much tougher and an extremely awkward style to boot. That said, Wlad is technically superior to big brother and hits harder.