More credibility than you have, little moron, to think the toemaker and pedvetkin are better legacy wins than the guy who demolished Wlad more impressively than anyone else and a guy who racked up wins against top 10 hw's, nearly beat Wlad, and was sitting champ against a guy who hadn't boxed for 4 years.
Good response (expect clearly not "virtually everyone else", as more than 30% view VK as having superior legacy). But, apart from that, fair points, it does come down to superior dominance vs superior single fights. I lean slightly toward the latter in this case.
Excellent post, very fair. Fleshes out the details of how I see it, except I'd give VK a slight advantage over WK. Point, is, its clearly very debatable for all the excellent reasons you detail.
Beating a Sanders who was old , over weight and at the end of his career does nothing for anybody's legacy. He wasn't a legacy win for Hasim Raham when he was prime ffsatsch To make matters worse , if he had trained and was ten years younger , he probably would've knocked Vitali out , as he completely tool'd him for the only few rounds he was able to box. Its like saying Rahman was a legacy win for Povetkin. Worse actually since Rahman is greater than Sanders.
why was 38 year old failed contender sanders at his peak against vitali? why was a failed contender prime sanders a better win than all the other contenders rahman beat? becos wlad was easy enough to beat that when retired corrie easily crushed him? why does it make no sense to say rahman was better than povetkin? - in the pro sense he was, he won the world title, lineal and I think undisputed. povetkin has yet to do so with a single world title, but in his defence he has much better amateur accomplishments. You provided NO answers at all.
You're an absolute clown. He was totally shot to bits, fat , uninterested and only turned up for a cheque. Thats a troll comment. Nothing more.
Gee, HG, you'd been behaving so well for so long since my last beat down on you. I'd been restraining myself from criticizing your generally more reasonable comments. But sure, guess its time for another beat down, answers above.
Sorry, I forgot I had to make accommodations for learning impaired readers like you. Deal with it moron, learn to read. I guess if you had that kind of intelligence, though, you wouldn't have such laughable theories on anything relating to the K's.