who is far more removed from his prime and the more damaged boxer, cotto or bradley?

Cotto by far. Looked vulnerable not only vs Margo and Pacman, but he struggled mightily vs Clottey too. People forgetting about that one. Many thought he lost or could of gone either way. Clottey not a big puncher either.

 

Why are you even including Bradley in a topic like this? :-(

 

:rofl what a ****in ******ed thread. ******* agendas are embarrassing as ****.

a better question would be, who is the better fighter and who would win between Cotto Vs. Bradley

 

The threads question doesn't really make too much sense. Has Bradley even reached his prime? Has he even peaked yet?

 

get em, Lance. let this ******ed "fanboy" have it :bbb:yep

 

Obviously Cotto. What the **** type of ******* thread is this. Stop trying to push your bull**** agenda.

It's like someone making a thread "Who is the bigger, stronger man: Cotto or Bradley?"

 

:rofl Even Lance (Floyd's #1 hater) won't back this ****ing idiot up on this one.

Absolutely ****ing pathetic. :-(

 

A better question would be why did Pacquiao want nothing to do with the past prime, damaged Cotto anywhere near his own weightclass. :yep

 

cotto is better. doesnt matter if bradley is closer to his prime or is younger. besides marquez(which he pretty much lost) all of the other fights for pac since cotto have been bad.

 

:rofl

now theyre saying floyd cotto is a better fight. hmm...

 

youre a ******. period.

 

Dumb thread.

How about who would win if they fought now.

Cotto or Bradley?

 

No way to logically refute what I posted, so you immediately resort to insults.

Truth hurts, doesn't it, *****. :yep

 

This thread is funny,

Bradley is more prime, cotto is better, they are in different leagues,

This opinion will of course change when pac struggles and Floyd wins pretty much every round.