who is far more removed from his prime and the more damaged boxer, cotto or bradley?

Take note SDfaggot, THIS right here is ownage. Not just some rambling bull**** thinking you made a point Mr.Lawyer, sir.

 

Cotto > Bradley

 

Damn 83.49% for Cotto! Damaged Goods.

 

You kidding?

Cotto is motivated now. He's a completely different fighter. Did you miss what he did to Foreman, Mayorga and Margarito? He's the best JMW in the world. It's safe to say he is repaired goods now, and is back in his prime.

 

Nah just shocked on how many people voted for Cotto.

 

That wasn't directed at you, my man. :good

I was just messing around.

 

i wouldnt say either guy is damaged goods. but bradley hasn't been in the type of grueling wars cotto has been in. when you look back to cotto vs torres, margarito, clottey, and pacquiao the answer seems obvious. i think bradley is just entering his prime now while cotto may be a tiny bit past it. but i still think cotto is a better boxer than bradley, even at this point. I think bradley get's a little too overzealous and excited in his approach.

 

Bradley is actually in his prime.

 

Why can't people see this. When Floyd UD's someone, let alone KO's them, he finishes there career, he exposes them, he lays down the blue print, and they are finished as a fighter.

When Manny Pac, Sparks someone out or destroys them, its only because he cheated, and therefore the defeated fighters can go on to fight Mayweather becuse they are now better fighters.

Why don't people get this. It makes perfect sence to me.