Who is greater? Manny Pac. or Roberto Duran?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MAG1965, Nov 11, 2009.


  1. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    He beat very good guys at 135, but not great guys. You said it. Barkley? Beating Barkley made him great? Kalambay,Nunn,Benn all beat him at middleweight, then Toney and Maske and Washington beat him later and others. Barkley's only claim to fame was beating the great Hearns, and that was because he had a great style matchup. But the fact is Duran lost to multiple greats Benitez,Hearns,Hagler,Leonard. How are Duran's skills legendary? I think they were good, but not top 10. His plodding foot positioning is not top 10 ATG.. He lost to Leonard and all the greats like I said. Somehow people forget that Duran lost the rematch easily.I do not think beating Leonard when Ray was inexperienced and just won his first title means that automatically puts Duran top 5. Duran would not have beaten the Leonard of 1981 like he did in 1980.. Because the proof is he couldn't beat him even in late 1980. No way.. He didn't even knock out a young Leonard when Ray fought Duran's fight. Then Ray beat him easily the next two times once Ray got the experience. Ray was top 5 maybe, but not Duran.
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Manny looks up to the likes of Duran why is this even a debate :huh
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I agree with you, it was not a great move. I know Duran called Ray's wife a name and Ray reacted like a young inexperienced guy he was, but you do not brawl with Duran and give him what he wants. But even with Ray fighting Duran's fight,Duran did not stop him. Duran not stopping Ray even when Ray fought his fight means Duran is top 5 ATG just on that?? That is what some guys on here are saying. Where does that put the young inexperienced Ray? Number one? Say Duran would have stopped Ray that night and Ray never fought again, no one would have known how great Ray was because his greatest fights were after the first Duran fight when he improved. Ray got experience and learned in that fight that boxing is mental as well as physical, and he then stopped Duran when Duran quit. And Duran knew he was going to be stopped in the rematch, so he quit to prevent that. Notice how Roberto was starting to get hit to the head and body in round 8? Roberto knew what was coming. But yeah I agree, Ray made a mistake of fighting. I will never understand why Duran is rated as high as he is. I do not get it. Propanga has made him greater than he was. He just does not have the wins to warrant top 10 ATG. You have to beat legends over and over again to pass up those legends in the ATG list. He did not do it. How can he jump over guys he never beat.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    It is a good comparison. Manny has fought some good guys and beat them. Duran did not beat the great guys he fought. If you look at thier resumes, Pacman has beaten more great guys than Duran. Take a look. Yeah Duran has that machismo and aura about him, but that does not change his resume. If you study his resume he did not beat great fighters except Ray, and Ray was just 6 months into his first reign as champ. Even a great fighter like Hagler got a draw with Vito Antuofermo in his first title chance (same night Ray won his title over Benitez). So what happened when Hagler rematched Vito? He stopped him. What happened when Leonard rematched Duran? He stopped him. Ray learned and got better. Duran did not beat the real Leonard who was legend later, and he won a decision over and inexperienced guy.
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    hey scatterbrain, you joined the same month I did. Good post count you have. I only have 2,830 or so. You have much more than me. Good job. I was looking at the list last night of postings and who has the most. Rumsfeld is at 40,000.
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Nah I don't think so because 1 diffrent eras and two diffrent opponents ..Lets not forget that Duran was fighting 15 rounders agaisnt legends ..Not to say that Manny is not a legend but do you think he'd have the success he has now fight people like Hagler,Hearns and Leonard ?And Duran did not beat the real Leonard come on now ?Leonard just got better after that loss ..Sorry but I will not dismiss that win because of inexperience ..
     
  7. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    i will say amen to that. add to that he lost to hearns big time. something that will be a knock on him.

    true, pac also lost but those were so early in his career it becomes insignificant.

    if people would insist that duran was top 5. where would that put srl, hagler and hearns who beat him up convincingly.
     
  8. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    i have been a lurker before i joined though.

    the post count is heavy because of the esb tambayan in the lounge were we spend our time posting pics of chicks and making fun of pac. :lol::rofl

    all in the spirit of fun.

    plus, i get to debate a lot with the floydettes here like nallege, eze and pimp c.

    hence the count.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    This is why I never understood why Duran was rated so high. Is it because he fought until he was 50? I am not sure. But guys like Yuri boy Campas are going to have 150 fights and fight until they are 50 probably. Fact is Duran did not beat the legends he had to for that placing. Had he beaten Benitez at 154, and then Hearns and Hagler, then I would have said, ok he beat the 4 greats he fought, he is top 5. But he didn't beat them. I am not sure why people rate him high. Of those who rate him high, no one ever gives me a real answer
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Still that is a good count. I post a lot at times and then not for awhile. I don't think many people like my comments on Duran. I am just being honest. I am not trying to insult Roberto and I do think he is great, but not top 10- top 35-45. Which is good.
     
  11. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    not just give us a real answer but they seem to vanish outright.

    just goes to show that they voted because of passion or fondness for past fighter and not out of reason.

    its just like saying the bill laimbeer is better than shaq because laimbeer played in an era of jabar and magic johnson.
     
  12. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    exactly my sentiments.

    he is great. even if srl fought the duran fight, duran actually looked better throwing the combos when speed and combo was more the forte of srl.

    truly a masterful performance.

    again the quartet of srl, hagler, hearns and duran I think is best compared to the quartet of mab, em, jmm and pac who had their own merry go round of fights amongst each other.

    of late, the only possible combo would be margo, cotto, mosley and pbf although the latter did not join the fun.
     
  13. carias

    carias Active Member Full Member

    1,156
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    Durans level of competition at the higher weights was scary. No catchweight bull**** and he fought some KILLERS at their natural weight. I would love to see how Pacquiao would have fared against SRL or Hearns at 147 much less Hagler at 160. I'd say Duran is better, but Pacquiao can make up some ground if he handles Mayweather.
     
  14. carias

    carias Active Member Full Member

    1,156
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    The difference is that Duran was giving up size and weight in all his fights with these guys and a significant amount.
     
  15. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    you have a point there considering hearns was freakishly tall for his weight class.

    but the first fight against srl, they were more or less on even footing. even with hagler although the marvelous looked pretty ripped and duran looked like he had the physique of barrera.