Who is Higher in the List of ATG? Tito Or Oscar?

Oscar, although I'm a much bigger fan of Tito. Oscar - stiffer comp, more titles, and he truly won the Tito fight.

 

Ok. I can get down with that

 

Oscar imo, granted he lost a lot of the big fights he was involved in. Still a 6 weight world champ and is a household name when it comes to boxing.

 

:thumbsup

Do people forget Tito has a staggering 2-3 record when not using illegal handwraps?

 

Oscar. Tito is a fraud

 

Oscar lost all his big fights...ALL of them. Only thing I can give him that would bring up above Tito is the gold medal.

DLH ran aganist Tito
DLH got knocked out by B. Hop
DLH won a gift decision aganist Strum...we all know he lost that fight.

 

Tito got KTFO by B-Hop also and was clearly losing all rounds, at least Oscar was winning some rounds vs B-HOP

Tito got humiliated by Winky and Roy Jones

Oscar Gold Medalist and richest boxer with a promotional company> Tito wtf does he got? A bunch of nuthuggin puerto ricans screamin "Tito Tito" ROTFLMAO

 

Come on man Oscar got tko by a body punch. Tito stayed with Hopkins for 12 rounds.

Tito was waaaaaaay past his prime aganist winky and rjj.

Money has nothing to do with being a ATG.

And what about the other fights that I mentioned??

 

To Oscars credit tho, he was robbed in the 2nd Mosley fight, and deserved the fight against Tito IMO.

Both fighters are ATG's tho, and are 2 of the best from their era.

 

yeah no doubt about it. Both of them are ATG. And like I said Idc who is ahead of who, but its not by a wide margin. We wouldn't be having this discussion if they would have signed for the rematch.

 

For sure, dudes arent that far from each other in ATG rankings.

Anyone who says otherwise is delusional.

Personally, i have Morales, Barrera, Oscar, Tito, and Mosley in the same group right after the other but in no particular order.

 

Oscar was fighting stiff competition from day one and was knocking them out while climbing the divisions. Tito fought some tough competition too but at times he stalled and you sort of get the impression "where is this guy going?" After the Tito/Oscar fight both men started to slip (granted both men had been in the sport a long time.)

At the end of the day it does come down to your own criteria, mine incorporating things like H2H and longevity etc.

I have Oscar clearly ahead of Tito but don't take anything anyway from Tito. The man was beast.

On a slightly relevant if much more seperate note, look at Oscar's competition from day one of his pro career. No guys with losing records, lots of experienced fighters early on, a number of "0" guys. Impressive stuff considering the guy is generally remember from about 2005 onwards by some posters.

 

Trinidad, who is one of the greatest welterweights that ever lived.

 

Do you think Trinidad deserved the win against de la hoya?

 

Did you think Oscar won against Felix Sturm?