Who is Manuel Quezada and why is Arreola fighting him?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by v2k987, Jul 6, 2010.


  1. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    Took a look at his record. Nothing impressive. Guy is 32, low KO% with only one notable name on his record as far as i can see and thats the mighty Travis Walker.

    This seems like a nothing fight for Chris but i guess he has to work his way into a contender status again.
     
  2. IvyLeague

    IvyLeague Guest

    I remember Quezada was gaining sum hype not too long ago.. Arreola needs a confidence builder and he's the perfect opponent.. Quezada is nothing special but he's not a bum.
     
  3. Sdt

    Sdt Active Member Full Member

    638
    0
    Mar 8, 2007
    I think he's the mexican champ or something like that
     
  4. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    i dont know what i was expecting from arreola... i guess this is the right move for him
     
  5. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,372
    555
    Sep 14, 2008
    Good fight...Both like to mix it up and come foward...Arreola by ko6 in a good scrap...
     
  6. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Arreola and Quezada have the same promoter, so it's an easy fight to make. Also, Quezada is ranked by one of the sanctioning bodies, sadly. Can't expect much more than this for an ESPN fight.
     
  7. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Well both are from Cali and both are Chicano heavyweights. Quezada is ok he is no world beater but far from a bum, he was actually starting to make some noise not long ago. This is a perfect opponent for Chris someone he can probably look impressive against and a marketable fight in SO Cal.
     
  8. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    964
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Quezada is a bum and thats why Arreola is fighting him.
     
  9. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,279
    5,905
    Oct 5, 2009
    I liek this fight Areolla just lost but is taking on a credible guy and staying in the mix

    he had a great fight vs Adamek but lost and broke his hand

    a safe fight and a confidence builder and a worthy opponent
     
  10. boxer1025

    boxer1025 Guest

    If he was fighting a bum then he would fight you!! :bbb
     
  11. Golden Boy 360

    Golden Boy 360 Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow Full Member

    11,452
    11
    Mar 14, 2009
    he needs to get back to his winning ways. i heard this will be a war.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,562
    83,416
    Nov 30, 2006
    You could just as easily ask "Who is Cristobal Arreola and why is Quezada fighting him?"

    They're on the same level.
     
  13. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    964
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    I turned it down because of the short money.
     
  14. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    No way Arreola would lose to the guy who beat Quezada last. Arreola is still a dangerous heavy IMO and closer to a top 5 heavyweight than top 10. If he ever gets his self in shape hed whup anyone not name Klitchko.
     
  15. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,149
    10,574
    Jul 28, 2009
    Okay, Arreola has fought two champs that I know of and lost to both of them. One a thirty-eight year old who schooled him in every conceivable way and another who was a light HW and CW champion that was too mobile, quick and crafty. Is he somehow obligated to fight better? Is it even the right move for him to fight better right now? Is Quezada really a bum or just an okay guy who isn't a top ten fighter?