Who is more over rated ? Amir Khan or David Haye ?

No depth on his resume at CW.

He got a gift decision for a paper title at HW.Fought corpses and even managed to fix a fight.

 

Why do you have to bs man or are you just trolling?

Haye beat Valuev fairly easily even the fight boring and Haye did a lot of running and did not throw alot of punches. the the main thing is Haye was the only one to land punches in that fight.

 

I aint Brittish and no big fan of Haye. If you try to troll me you waste your time.

Haye fought average opposition at cruiser, but he still proved a point by steamrolling them the way he did.

Valuev was clearly a paper champ since he los to Chagaev. But it was no gift decision. The other heavies he fought were average. But both Ruiz and Barret came to fight.

 

considering that Haye is probably a better fighter than Khan, but that Khan is probably rated higher than Haye by most...

pretty clear that Khan is more overrated.

 

Not trolling just calling it as it is.

 

Haye would smash most heavy's, especialy ones the same size could you imagine haye-adamek haye would be locked up for murder lol.

 

The legend grows...the resume stays the same.

Haye's whole career is based on what Hayelords claim he would,could or should do without actually doing it.

Plenty of HW's out there Haye would struggle with.

 

Not Adamek, though.

 

Team Adamek HBO and Main Events have tried to make that fight on numerous occasions.

Guess who is the unwilling party?

If Haye can go life and death with Mormeck,Fragomeni and Thompson his so easily beating Adamek is not as easy as you may think.

 

Actually, I think Adamek is a cool fighter. But I dont think he is big enough for fighthing at HW, at least not at a top level. It will be interesting to see how he does against Chambers, though.

In any case I believe Haye is a lot more talented than Adamek. The difference in speed and power would be too much. I guess Adamek would have a better chance against Haye at cruiser, since Haye must drain himself a bit to make weight. But I would still favour Haye to win.

 

No question Adamek is WAY more well rounded than Haye is.

Adamek not being able to compete at the TOP only puts him on the same boat as the rest of the ENTIRE HW division.

Haye has shown that he cannot compete at the top level also.

 

I think you are biased. Haye has better power and a better chin. I think he has better speed and reflexes as well, though Adameks handspeed is pretty good.

I think Haye did a lot better against Wlad compared how Adamek did against Vitali. And I consider Wlad to be the better of the bro's at this point in their careers. I fail to see how anyone can disagree with this, but I dont expect you to change your opinion.

 

Khan no doubt... We maybe said to ourselves that he could get Mayweather a good fight and without a doubt was the man at 140, but then got exposed by Peterson. Khan lost to two fighters, he never should've lost to.

Many of us thought that Klitschko would outclass Haye and he did.. Haye lost to Carl Thompson which is far better than the bum Bredis prescott and he lost to an ATG in KlitschkO

However I still rate Froch higher than both without a doubt

 

Lets just end the discussion right therelol:

 

Both of them are bashed like **** so both are under rated, most of you need to pick another small country to chat **** about, Khan is a top LWW, Haye even retired is the current 3rd best HW.

The TS from America?- The country who no doubt care about boxing more than any other country, close with mexico, pretty much every fighter apart from Floyd Mayweather and Andre Ward are over rated, if this poster is american you need to look at what you have first before saying **** about others.

The TS Polish? Kerry Proska's father Hope, all I'm saying.

Mexican/PR can't really say anything but fortunately for my argument no one from either of these nations care about Britain