Who is more over rated ? Amir Khan or David Haye ?

Adamek loses 10 rounds to Vitali while getting carried
Chisora wins a couple of rounds against Vitali
Fury destorys Chisora, Haye knocks Chisora out
Haye beats Fury to make my case stronger? almost certainly.

Haye > Adamek

It's simple easy to follow logic

 

Khan

 

Fury over all going by your logic:thumbsup

You seem to forget there are HW prospects and contenders outside of the UK.

I know you Hayelords seem to think that Haye and Chisora are by default next in line as soon as the Klits are gone but you are ignoring the rest of the Globe:good

Just remember...

Adamek 45-2

Haye+Chisora 40-5

:smooch

 

I hardly know what to say.

Haye took some clean nasty rights from Wlad. He was rocked, but able to move away when Wlad tried to fallow up. Adamek was wobbled by jabs from Vitali.

 

Khan got exposed? It's like you guys are in shock.

As soon as Khan turned pro we all knew Khan had no inside game, he was a 1D fighter and that he couldn't adjust if thing's were going wrong for him. So no big suprise there.
Khan is and think always will never bridge the gap between being an amateur and proffesional fighter.

For a fighter with no inside game he hasn't done bad at all... net worth 20 million. Whereas, Haye he fooled all you Brit's and took your money like a G.

 

Haye has been down 3x as much as Adamek with half the number of fights.

If you want to simply base fighters entire careers off of 1 fight lets compare Adamek vs Vit to Haye vs Thompson.Now tell me who would you rather get TKO'd by?

 

Haylord thats a new one, and no, haye over all because him beating fury is a given, and all that proves is that Adamek padded his career more.

 

Yes we all know every mythical match up involving Haye has him winning by brutal KO easily.Haye's ESB mythical record is now 75-0 75KO's.:thumbsup

But then there is the actual real world...where Haye never fights has a very weak resume with a low number of fights.

Coulda,woulda,shoulda...the story of Haye's career.

 

No mtter how much you hate the fact that he is better than Adamek, you gotta admit he is almost certain to beat Fury, btw i don't think he ko's either adamek or fury, just beats them.

 

Adamek does well at LHW and CW, but he aint a natural heavy. Haye is. Wlad is extremly good at producing KO's. If he cant stop Haye, it is not likely Vitali can. Adamek would get stopped by both bro's ten times out of ten.

Thompon knocked Haye down with clean and hard right shots. Vitali wobbled Adamek with a jab. This does not prove or suggest Adamek has a better chin.

 

Some people believed Haye would dominate heavyweight.... he didnt... thus he is the more overated fighter (really detest that term)

 

Adamek got wobbled by a ****ing jab from the lighter hitting brother, at cruiserweight i would agree Adamek possesed the better chin but not at heavyweight.

 

The Polish fella will have to back down from that standpoint. It's impossible to defend.

 

Haye has better speed, skills, reflexes, power and chin.

What does Adamek have over Haye? Better work rate that's about it.

At Heavy his Chin is pure China. He was on ***** street from Jabs for ****s sake.