Who is more past their prime? Floyd or Pac?

Pacquiao

 

pac.......... but he would still put a beating on floyd

 

Up until Floyd's last two fights I thought Pac, now I've got to say Floyd.

 

Pac,because of his style,he is been into many wars,fighting bigger opponent,taking more damages, etc, we can floyd preserve his body well done pac,we age differently inside the ring.

 

:deal

 

This is the reason I also say Pacquiao.

 

Pacman has a high energy style that ages very poorly. His punch output has dropped tremendously. He has taken way more punishment. Floyd fights in a low energy style with low output and low risk. He has taken little damage, and his style ages well.
Pac is much further past his prime.

 

i would have said pac until floyd v maidana 2. he was getting hit and what looked like outboxed in the centre of the ring at times. the first fight was closer and more competitive sure but thats because of maidana pinning and roughing up floyd who did a very good job on the inside defending and countering. the rematch we saw floyd look average in HIS DOMAIN (boxing the center of the ring) against a guy who is not known for his boxing ability


pacs clearly lost a few steps mainly in the aggression department, for a while i felt his stamina took a massive hit especially in bradley 1 where it seemed he was only fighting for 1 minute a round but he has since picked it way back up and in the 4th fight with marquez showed us that he does still have the ability to be ferocious but because of how that fight ended i dont think we will see that reckless pac ever again (might be for the better)


conclusion - about the same

 

After watching Floyd's last 2 fights, it's the first times I ever thought PAC has a chance to beat him. I think Floyd's slipping and has declined more.

 

Then why did you choose Floyd UD? If you pick floyd to win what are you blabbering about?