disagree with that. 94-97 was his prime. i think he was at his very best in 95 when he was a super bantam. shame he never fought barrera that year. might have been very interesting indeed. :yep
OMG!! How did i miss that fight i gotta tell my fam bam about that one I must tivo all fights from here on out!:good
actually someone put up the clip of naz saying he would have beaten bazza. :yep mcguigan would have tore naz a new one the night he tired against paul ingle. bazza would have buried him that night. :bbb
he would of buried any version of hamed during his peak years from 84-86. terrible how barney eastwood treated him. he should never have been boxing steve cruz
according to bob sheridan and bobby cyz, daniel was 5"7. check this clip: http://youtube.com/watch?v=tt_IkMTIi8E about the 1:16 mark
The only stand out name on McGuigans record is Pedroza and it took all he had to beat him despite the fact he was significantly past his peak. McGuigans head down come forward attack (and defence) would have been meat and drink to Hamed, Naz would have blown the Cyclone away.