Who is rated higher ? Foreman or Frazier ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Mar 17, 2010.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,178
    25,427
    Jan 3, 2007

    Agreed, although some of those guys were extremely bad though. Ron Stander, Manuel Ramos, Dave Zyglewicz, and Terry Daniels were among some of the very weakest challengers in heavyweight boxing history, and a couple of them even finished their careers with nearly as many or more losses than they had wins....
     
  2. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    i rate foreman a few places above joe
     
  3. Lobotomy

    Lobotomy Guest

    But he certainly didn't duck Quarry, Bonavena or Ellis (and Jimmy was far better against Ringo than Joe had been).

    The argument could be made that he essentially ruined Ramos, Ziggy and Daniels, and beat up the very finest versions of all three. Stander acquitted himself with honor, but discovered that simply forcing Joe to give ground was not enough in and of itself to defeat him. (In that one respect though, Big Ron had considerably more success than Layne had with Marciano. I've often wondered how Rocky would have responded if Rex indeed had been strong enough to force him back. Marciano was a miniature Gibraltar in that one, truly an immovable object.)
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,178
    25,427
    Jan 3, 2007
    Frazier's wins over Ali, Quarry, Ellis, Bonavena and to a lesser degree, Mathis are what make his resume.. Stander, Zyglewicz, Ramos and Daniels were nothing more than filler fights.. We can speculate all we want about them being potentially good fighters who Frazier simply "ruined", but at the end of the day these men do no more for Frazier's resume than Jack Roper did for Louis's.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
  6. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,163
    10,601
    Jul 28, 2009
    It's really more heavyweights and heavyweights, isn't it?
     
  7. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Id say the oranges must be ranked higher.
    Its the vitamin 'c' on the resume that clinches it.
     
  8. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    Joe, my namesake is my favourite heavyweight ever but I see no justifiable way of putting him above Foreman. I have Foreman #4, Frazier #8 currently.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    You're underrating apples, you can make Cider from apples (alcoholic cider for Americans) and they have the vitamin C attribute in their own right
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,459
    11,497
    Jan 6, 2007
    Foreman (3 or 4)

    Frazier (9)
     
  11. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,932
    Feb 21, 2009
    I think Foreman should be ranked higher than Frazier.
     
  12. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,163
    10,601
    Jul 28, 2009
    Screw you! Oranges KO1 Apples!

    Apples: Mg per 100 grams - 6
    Oranges: 53


    Source: Homeless guy who lives in front of my local Walmart who used to be a nutritionist in Zaire, according to him.
     
  13. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,239
    2,435
    Mar 26, 2005
    I like Frazier......beat Jerry Quarry...Oscar Bonavena....Jimmy Ellis...Buster Mathis...
    Bob Foster....Ali in the FOTC.......after that fight in 1971...Joe was never the same...he
    left everything he had in the ring that night in MSG
     
  14. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009

    I try not to dwell on lists too much because they really don't mean much to me. There will always be certain guys that get a mention as one of the best ever... that should be good enough for them and their fans.

    As for comparing Foreman and Frazier??? There is no comparison. Foreman was much better. Frazier matched up well with Ali, Foreman did not... but I do think Foreman would have done better in a rematch vs. Ali.

    Frazier won more HW World title fights but I have no doubts Foreman would have crushed any fighter that Frazier beat (with the exception of Ali).

    Frazier was great, but Foreman was better.

    OK, for the first time on this forum I will speak on my top 10 HWs of all-time list.

    01. Ali
    02. Holmes
    03. Holyfield
    04. Foreman
    05. Louis
    06. Marciano
    07. Frazier
    08. Lewis
    09. Tyson
    10. Liston

    Ask me again tomorrow and I met give you a different answer. I will say this though... the top 5 rarely changes and I always have Ali at #1 and Holmes at #2.
     
  15. Doc Dynamo

    Doc Dynamo Member Full Member

    232
    2
    Mar 12, 2010
    This is a head scratcher.

    If Frazier retired after Ali I--like Yank Durahm urged him to do--he'd probably be ranked as the greatest HW of all time, wouldn't he? So were downgrading him for his post prime prefroamces, which doesn't seem completely fair.

    On the otehr hand, Foreman destrioyed Fraier H2h. I think Foreman is the ultimate nightmare matchup for Frazier and would probably KO him even in his prime.

    I agree with Lobotomy that Frazier would do better than Foreman against a tournament of all time HWs. Foreman would have problems against good boxer/movers with strong chins. Joe Jeannette for example might beat Foreman.

    So on balance I rate Frazier higher, but it's a tough call.