Who is the best boxer Wlad has ever beat?

Has to be one of these: Peter, Brock, Chambers, or Chagaev.


The Nightmare, the Banker and White Tyson were undefeated at the time if I'm not mistaken but I may be wrong

 

I think a good way to rephrase this would be like if Haye went vs Chagaev, Ibragimov, Peter, Brock, and Chambers, would he go 5-0?

 

Some interesting fights. I've never seen Brock in a fight he won, but the others are all hard to call. For some reason I'd love to see Haye-Ibragimov, its a shame Iggy has been inactive for so long

 

If Ruiz can jab Haye, you better believe Wladimir can.. If Barrett can knock Haye down, you had better believe Wlad can..

It is still the best match up that can be made, but it isnt like anyone is saying they think Haye will decision Wladimir, it is still people banking on the excitement of Haye landing that one punch..

I want to see Haye - Tua, haha.

 

No, not a chance in hell...

 

Corrie Sanders...wait,no ,he got KO by sanders

 

If you look closely, you'll see it was actually by Sanders' golf club. I wish they'd review that tape again. Maybe overturn it. That's completely illegal.

 

Not one damn fighter Wlad has fought is better than Haye.

 

At the time when Wlad fought them.

Ibragimov
Peter
Chambers
Thompson
Byrd
Chagaev
Brewster II (definitely knocks Haye out)
Brock


I would take them all over David Haye to be honest. The only ones that I would give Haye a decent chance against that group would be Brock. I honestly think that Iggy would dominate Haye... as would Chagaev. The in shape Peter that Wlad fought would walk him down and put him out. Brewster would either take him out early... or easily weather the storm and take the stamina challenged Haye out later in the fight. Chambers, Thompson, and Byrd would simply outbox him. I give the edge to the undefeated Brock that Wlad faced as well.

I also think that Povetkin (Who Wlad hasn't fought yet) would batter Haye, tbh. I gave Haye his credit for what beating Ruiz. Let's face it though... beating a 38 year old Ruiz who was already incredibly beatable in his prime isn't a huge accomplishment. Neither was his horrible performance against Valuev that I actually thought Valuev may have won. He definitely did worse against Valuev than old Holyfield did. After rewatching Haye vs Ruiz... I came away actually shocked at how sloppy Haye is. He is going to get into some SERIOUS trouble against a real top heavyweight that can put him out. He hasn't fought even a decently hard hitter yet at HW. Let alone a top HW with a serious skill set to work with. He beat Barrett after Barrett had already been knocked out in 2 rounds by Couser. We already went over what happened with Valuev and Ruiz. Ruiz has only won 3 of his last 8 fights and is only getting older and worse everyday. His only 3 wins in that 11 fight span were against Otis Tisdale who is 25-23-1 in his sparkling career, a horrible version of Mcline, and Adnan Serin (19-11-1). That is John Ruiz' only victories in over 5 years! The fact that this man keeps getting a title shot is ****ing amazing to me.

 

Injury ravaged? Brewster had previously injured his eye, which was 100% healed well before the fight ever took place. Brewster himself admits this... it's sad that you guys still can't. It's a ****in eye man... you can either see properly or not. He could see... it was 100% recovered and his vision was perfect. So... how exactly is that "injury ravaged"?

You are wrong... it was the same exact Brewster that he had fought before. It was a different Wladimir Klitschko.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Byrd, who was MUCH better than Chambers prime for prime.

 

It is kind of funny actually. That all of those guys would beat David Haye, yet so many people buy into his hype because of what he says in media interviews. Funny... but sad.

 

has to either be byrd, sultan, or chagaev. we all know how peter's career turned out.