Who is the Best Featherweight(126) in the last 20 years?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Mar 11, 2009.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    You're an idiot. I'm not saying that Pacquiao would beat SRR, I'm saying he was better than Barrera, Morales, Hamed and Marquez. For you to even compare that to saying Pacquiao would beat SRR goes to show that you are more like Johnco than I am, you're just the other side of the coin.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pacquiao had 1 incredible win (2 in my eyes) at 126 but his body of work around 126 is enough to show that at 126 he is the best fighter at the weight between those in the poll.


    Answer me this: Who is a better JrWW, Ricky Hatton or Floyd Maywaether
     
  3. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    No matter what, polls like this nearly always boil down to who your "favourite" fighter is as opposed to who you honestly think was the best. Whenever Pacs in a poll like this its inevitable he'll come out the winner. Logic flies out the window. If Pac wasnt in included, Morales would likely be the winner. Why? Because he's the next most loved fighter out of them all.

    Its very hard to find people who can suspend their favouritism. I get criticized a lot for this. Im a big Hatton fan, and always strongly support him when hes fighting. But i dont think he's that good a fighter and think Manny will destroy him. And for that i get called a "dumb ****" and a million other things. I even got a couple of mentions in the "Top Clown of ESB" :)

    But back to the topic, and after reading through all the posts, it seems to me that Barrera is the rightful winner here.
     
  4. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Ricky Hatton, clearly.

    Floyd did not do enough work at the weight, and in fact, it was even less impressive of a stay than Manny's was at 126lb.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    well then its clear to see why we disagree.

    while you think its Hatton, clearly... I think its Maywaether, clearly.


    Does that make me a Mayweather fanboy?
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Fair enough point.
     
  7. Nigel_Benn

    Nigel_Benn Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,067
    220
    Apr 11, 2005
    Weres Azumah Nelson?
     
  8. Nigel_Benn

    Nigel_Benn Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,067
    220
    Apr 11, 2005
    I voted Barrera i think his resume at 126 was better then the other fighters posted on the poll despite the fact they all hold wins over him.
     
  9. rreed23

    rreed23 aka Gordon Gekko Full Member

    1,874
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
  10. KingKrish

    KingKrish Active Member Full Member

    616
    0
    Mar 10, 2009
    I think Hamed has deprived us of some mega matches.

    If he stayed dedicated I think he would have had the beating of Manny, and Morales.

    I think Marquez and Barrera would have had Naz's number as they were counter punchers.

    Though if Freddie Norwood(tricky southpaw) could beat Marquez I would have to give Naz a shot.
     
  11. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    bottom line is he lost a fight that he wasnt supposed to lose and never had the balls to bounce back from a sorry lost
     
  12. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    he doesn't know how to bounce back from a loss and that shows his what kind of heart he has...he is exciting and memorable but that about it..
     
  13. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    not only that, hamed doesn't have the heart to bounce back after a loss...pac, morales, jmm and barrera all showed that they can bounce back from a set back