Haye: Overall, I think he has the better natural attributes, Speed/Power ect. Adamek: 2nd, Because IMO he still don't have his HW legs. (In times he still looks a bit like HW is too much for him) Povetkin: Mystery man, Let's see what Atlas adds to him.
Povetkin is a chicken and Haye is a chicken farm Adamek is a rooster who is not afraid to fight with fox Adamek's got the attitude of a warrior. Haye has more powerfull punch and probalby is faster.Adamek's got the chin and the soul of a warrior. W hope I will see Haye vs Adamek Povetkin is very good but he is just funny now
Footwork and punching power are the elements that Adamek must improve in the first order. Despite it he is still the most complete fighter of these 3.
I think you have to give this to Ademek. Styles wise haye could deal with the big boys of the division better then the other two because of his speed and power. But technical boxing skills rule when men of equal stature fight and baring early KO against Sasha I wouldn't favour Haye against either Ademak or Povetkin. With his defeat of chambers Povetkin does own the best win of them all at heavyweight but I think he's a notch below the other two. My vote: Ademak - was a very solid Light heavy champ, was unified cruiser champ and has a better record there then Haye and has better wins at heavy then Haye as well. Plus styles wise I think he'd be a fairly good sized favourite over Haye, whom I believe would find it difficult to land on him.
adamek is the most proven and has by far the best resume. Only losing to the 2nd best boxer in all the world right now. Not bad by anyones standards