Alexander - better defence, better chin, more power? Khan Bradley - not sold on Tim, seems a bit limited to me
Alexander Khan Bradley I think both Khan and Alexander beat Bradley (probably via stoppage). Alexander either loses a close decision to Khan or he KO's him (probably the latter)
Alexander beat Witter more impressively than Bradley managed. Hes faster and slicker than Bradley. Khan makes amateur mistakes still, going backwards and forwards in straight lines and arm punching too much but Khan beggining to fight very tall and will be tricky. But Khans chin/power are big let downs Alexander is the best of the lot look at the Witter highlights [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FatCoX1_u2I[/ame]
Kkan Does not have the power and the defence to get past these guy's no way no how, khan better keep fighting second teir fighters because soons he steps up by by. :yep
Despite what the current rankings say, I have it the following in terms of talent: 1. Alexander 2. Bradley 3. Khan
Bradley is the best. I think he has the widest skill set, with plenty of raw athleticism and his attitude and approach are absolutely impeccable. I really think this guy is an all-round, P4P talent. Devon Alexander and Khan are about the same level. I've seen very little Alexander though, he sort of reminds me of Collazo, for whatever reason, doesn't really truly excell in any department, but is good and solid to compete at world class. Khan has some strong attributes, but I find him a bit predictable. He has very quick hands, throws nice combinations and has devloped an excellent jab. His power is unremarkable at the weight, and he doesn't go to the body very often, he's not very measured or patient which means against quick, skillful guys his accuracy isn't going to be as good as perhaps it should be. Defensively, his limitations are well documented and discussed. Ortiz I see as mentally fragile, ok he has a sold repertoire, but does he have the heart, is he just a GBP hype job? Maindana, alright, good entertainment, can punch, but he's been beaten, and some would say out-boxed, by a guy Khan absolutely out-classed. Hope all this doesn't sound too negative, they are all good fighters, with great potential, just trying to consider the pros and the cons.
I won't be making the over-the-top, wind-up statements I made before about Bradley.:yep Anyway, here is my list and why. 1) Bradley. Strikes me as a well-rounded, skilled boxer with innate maturity and seems a fighter who can stand up through adversity and pressure. I don't see this limited skills stuff his critics have been saying though. Not excellent in every facets of his game, but he looks like a prime time fighter, a legit quality champ for me. 2) Alexander. His last fight was rather impressive, and showed there his impeccable offensive game. More offensive minded and talented than Bradley, but I still feel Bradley will beat him if ever they fight with workrate and ring smarts. Right now, the story at 140 is Alexander and Bradley and the Others. I think he can even goes up to 147 and be equally effective. Off-topic about this guy: doesn't he get tired with all those shouts he makes whenever he punches? That should be a positive thing in evaluating his game.:yep 3) Khan. For all the skills and talent he brings to the table, one thing will be constant that will limit him as a great fighter: his chin. Bradley and Alexander will beat him. I even think Valero would have given him a tough fight.
1.Alexander best all aound fighter at 147 great chin great jab good defense and movement can counter and hs underrated power and great chin. 2.Bradley warrior spirt great stamina great all around boxing game. 3.Khan great handspeed good pop good size and strenght chin is still a question mark