Who is the best fighter - KHAN, BRADLEY or ALEXANDER

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, May 17, 2010.


  1. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Explain.

    Bradley has shown far more versatility.

    Alexander is bigger, that's it.
     
  2. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Bradleys more proven at this point and i voted for him although Kahn is making a strong case, and I wouldnt rule Alexander out either, its gonna be intresting to see who ends up going the farthest.... As of right know Bradley, but i can see Kahn or Alexander surpassing him someday.
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Better "FIGHTER"
    When I hear that word I assume you mean toe-toe stand-up.
    If that is the case I choose Bradley.
     
  4. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    This poll is ****ing spectacular...pretty much a dead heat three ways.

    Personally, I think: Khan takes Bradley, Bradley takes Alexander, Alexander takes Khan...everyone goes home happy:good
     
  5. horst

    horst Guest

    Cool, you have now answered the question as set.
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    Any fighter can lose when he is learning his trade. It's happened to many great fighters. And any fighter can get caught with a bomb from a big puncher, again that has happened to many fighters. Neither of these things are as indicative of limitations as having to toil for 12 long rounds at world championship level against a merely decent contender. Don't get me wrong, Bradley deserves great credit for having the balls to fight his way to victory when he himself is still a young champion, but I have never really rated Holt and expected Bradley to beat him more emphatically. Bradley is a good good fighter, but I think he lacks that bit of special quality. I see it in Khan - though his chin could always let him down I suppose.
     
  7. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,274
    98
    Apr 30, 2008
    I like Alexander but ive only seen the one fight against Urango so I have to say Bradley. Its a toss up
     
  8. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Bradley not great in any category but just aggressive tough and great stamina

    Khan good jab defense quick good strategy

    Alexander quick accurate some power so so defense he KO'd a never been stopped Urango but he got hit with so many right hooks by Urango that just means a faster guy would punish him
     
  9. Ecks

    Ecks Member Full Member

    472
    15
    Nov 13, 2009
    Right now it's

    Bradley
    >
    >
    >
    Alexander
    Khan

    In year or so it's

    Khan
    Bradley
    Alexander

    I think Bradley has too much to offer for these guys right now.
     
  10. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    **** thats a really close poll :think

    For me its Tim Bradley , but as the poll suggests its very close , id be tempted to go as follows :

    Bradley
    Alexander
    Khan
     
  11. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    1. Alexander
    2. Bradley


    3. Khan


    the differences between Alexander and Bradley are very close. Khan is in a distant third and will always have that chin issue
     
  12. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    How do you think it'll hold up if he fights Katsidis?
     
  13. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,292
    646
    Nov 13, 2008
    Right now Bradley has proved more than Khan and Alexander, but i think 9 months time Khan will be No.1 with all the belts.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    The thing is Bradley got caught by a howitzer against Holt twice, but he came back from adversity to win what would have been a wide decision if not for the KDs. Holt like Khan is tall, fast, rangy and had been taking on many of the best 140lbers beating the lot of them. It was a tough style for BRadley to over come and he did it by pressuring the rangy boxer. He'd have to do this against Khan to

    KHan's KO loss didnt just expose his chin, it was an exposure of his amateur style and defensive frailties. He still comes forward/backward in straight lines, doesnt set his feet when and keeps his chin high.

    I rate Khans speed, jab, stamina, athleticism, height/reach advantages but when it comes down to polished boxing skills hes a level below

    LEts not forget Khan has beating fighting C Level fighters who couldn't punch, a level below the likes Alexander/Bradley have being operating at

    Maybe Khan will win it, I'm looking forward to the match ups, lets just hope they come off in this sport were they often don't
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Katsidis doesn't deserve to be mentioned, we want the unification at 140