Who is the best opponent Hopkins has beaten?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Nov 5, 2007.


  1. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Tarver was on this list, as it stands, for many people. Either way it is to a degree irrelevant by virtue of the fact that Hopkins was planning to move to Light Heavyweight, and he did so in fighting the best possible opposition. If you're discrediting him for fighting the best possible fighter at that weight class, based on him not being high enough "pound for pound" for your liking, that's a pathetic joke.
     
  2. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    10
    Aug 7, 2004
    And then there is the discreditting of Tarver for what he has done since the fight (beating Murqui...), but give Calzaghe full credit for beating Eubank, when he got beaten badly is his last two fights after Joe and then promptly retired.

    The hypocriticalness (that really aint a word...is it? :lol: ) of it all is what is getting to me the most.
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Tell me about it. Before Hopkins dismantled Tarver, Tarver was being hailed as the top Light Heavyweight in the world by everyone. Recognized by everyone as the best. Installed as a massive favourite leading into his fight with Hopkins. I was among the few who picked Hopkins (when people said Hopkins was too small, didn't look good enough against Taylor, etc.), and then after the fight the morons decide rather than handing it to Hopkins, they discredit Tarver.

    Pathetic.
     
  4. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    10
    Aug 7, 2004
    Or the fact that they keep saying his output is bad....yet other than Taylor, where his whole gameplan was to pull back on his output, he outworked and outlanded EVERYONE he has fought dating back to Roy Jones?

    Its ridiculous.
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    I think a lot of people simply haven't followed Hopkins' career whatsoever. They haven't seen him in his prime, only really his Taylor fights.
     
  6. Jinx

    Jinx Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Aug 18, 2004
    he looked elite when was destroying William Joppy in 5 rds...Joppy was a legit middleweight titleholder...
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    Let me tell you why you're a total noob

    Hopkins has lost to 3 fighters, not 4

    Clinton Mitchell (his first loss) is nowhere near being even close to one of the best fighters Hopkins has fought. Even the most dumb**** haters who have never seen a Hopkins fight in their lives but still hate him know that, yet you don't.
     
  8. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
  9. MJRJJ23

    MJRJJ23 Active Member Full Member

    606
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    good post amsterdam, i'm impressed with your open minded thoughts most of the time, its nice to see a Joe C fan see reality, I know every now and then you get carried away about Joe C but its all good :good
     
  10. Bubba

    Bubba Pay $5 month or they will let me out of the cage Full Member

    2,487
    367
    Jul 19, 2004
    A prime and undefeated Tito Trinidad.
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Good post.
     
  12. eliezerm86

    eliezerm86 Member Full Member

    136
    0
    Oct 16, 2007
    I can't believe they even allow you to being this post. I mean why are u trying to degrade hopkins? maybe he never fought anyone at his weight that was an all time great but come on, the way hopkins was looking at middleweight was almost unstoppable. This isn't the times of hearns and hagler were there where 4 amazing fighters in each weight class. The last time we saw that was like 5 years ago with Corrales,Mayweather, Freitas and Casamayor. Hopkins has done and fought great opposition wether they were top class in his weight class that's up to your own jurisdiction, but he did take great risks. Calzaghe is good but he has fought all of his career in a relative unatractive weight class, a weight class that has really not produce many great champions or a weight class that many great fighters chose to oversee. This whole topic really makes no sense, this is yet another futile attempt by a hater of a fighter to bring down his stock to raise up the stock of the one they like. Kessler better than most of hops competition? are you delirious? Kessler hasn't done enough to even be considered great yet.