who is the best p4p ever

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tonyteb, May 13, 2010.


Page 13 of 14
  1. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    your still clueless when it comes to Robinson as a fighter

    and LaMotta, Turpin and Gavilan
     
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    #181
  2. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    so beating Brannon proves that Roy could beat LaMotta and Turpin easy,

    you should never talk about boxing again :-(
     
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    #182
  3. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    no only srr could beat them. please mabey you think you know more than you do
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #183
  4. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    please dont tell me roy wouldnt take apart lomotta or turpin they get hit so fast and nothing would be there to hit back lamotta has more skill than roy i think your the one who is cluless get real
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #184
  5. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    no only you know then prove it
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #185
  6. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    skill and athleticism are to two different things :deal
     
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    #186
  7. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    mate, you said Roy beating Brannon proves Jones would beat LaMotta and Turpin easy :patsch
     
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    sugarsean, May 17, 2010
    #187
  8. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Every single one of those fights...
    I was a fan of Ray Robinson since 1942...Please let well enough alone..I'm sorry that you think Ray Riobinson fought "NO NAMES", and oh yes the world is flat...
     
    burt bienstock, May 17, 2010
    burt bienstock, May 17, 2010
    #188
  9. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    If anyone fought no names its RJJ. Robinsons resume is close to if not the best of all time.
     
    Rise Above, May 17, 2010
    Rise Above, May 17, 2010
    #189
  10. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    please reread my post correctly thats not what i said
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #190
  11. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    prove i said that
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #191
  12. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    and please what skill did they possess that roy didnt
     
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    tonyteb, May 17, 2010
    #192
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    That "skill", is what our boxing ancestors called "BOTTOM"...
     
    burt bienstock, May 18, 2010
    burt bienstock, May 18, 2010
    #193
  14. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    you posted a video of Roys fight with Brannon, and I said why bring that up what does that prove and you said " my point is that Roy would beat anyone Robinson fought and easier " :deal

    so your saying that video of Roy beating Brannon, proves Roy would beat LaMotta and Turpin easy :patsch
     
    sugarsean, May 18, 2010
    sugarsean, May 18, 2010
    #194
  15. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    forget it onl srr could of beat those guys
     
    tonyteb, May 18, 2010
    tonyteb, May 18, 2010
    #195
Page 13 of 14