Who is the better boxer? Khan or Haye?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IronBull, Nov 11, 2009.


  1. IronBull

    IronBull Active Member Full Member

    931
    0
    Sep 1, 2005
    Who is it and why?
     
  2. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    Kahn, by far. Much more skills.
     
  3. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,366
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Wrong: Haye. He's more proven, a bigger puncher, better overall defense and his sole loss came to a former titlist rather than an unproven fighter, and was by stoppage rather than clean, brutal KO.
     
  4. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    and after all that Khan is still the better boxer (key term, boxer).
     
  5. champ1

    champ1 Member Full Member

    357
    0
    Nov 1, 2005
    khan got knocked out cold by a puncher, unproven puncher yes but his record still suggests he is a puncher.

    Haye is blessed with very good movement for a big man athletically and speed wise, he also has great power and very quick hands.

    khan has got lightening handspeed ...offensivley he is a joy to watch seems to have every punch, however i dont think he can box up close, his defense seems pretty sound but that is more down to the disciplined high hands he now sports.

    also Khans straight punching is brilliant...

    I would definitley say Khan has the better skillset
     
  6. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    Haye is the better athlete, Khan is technically better.
     
  7. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Hmmmm....I'd probably go with Khan. In the past year he seems to have the grasped the fundamentals a little better. There's not much difference between the two.

    However if you were to transfer them in to the same division, I'd probably pick Haye to win. With his type of power, he's always that one punch away from knocking Khan out.
     
  8. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    Haye of course......far more accomplished
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    What do you mean by 'better'?

    Haye has achieved far more.

    He's also more skilled. He's more varied, he can throw punches to head and body. Khan throws jabs all day.
     
  10. champ1

    champ1 Member Full Member

    357
    0
    Nov 1, 2005
    The Jab is the most important punch
     
  11. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Haye has now shown he's not one dimensional, something which Khan has failed to do.
     
  12. DeanoFlash

    DeanoFlash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,021
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    :deal
     
  13. GalangK

    GalangK Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    0
    Oct 3, 2004
    I'm just curious as to what Khan's one dimension is? He's a perfectly fine boxer technically so its not like he uses one thing over and over again.
     
  14. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    He's all straight punches strictly on the outside. No inside game, not much in the way of hooks, uppercuts and bodypunches.
     
  15. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Yes he does. He jabs and moves all over the ring. Which is okay, my favourite fighter primarily does that (without moving so much).

    Doesn't exactly make him more versatile than Haye though.