They can fight, one can win, it still wouldn't mean who is better overall. The better overall fighter is the fighter that can beat more fighters....more fighters with Varying Styles/Abilities. So who would you take against the field. Pac vs. May: Some think it will hurt Floyd's legacy if he loses but really, if Pac loses, people should question why he is losing to aging fighters like JMM and Floyd. Could it be that despite an athletic/physical decline and age from these two fighters, JMM and Floyd; that a superior "technical" fighter, smart fighter, like JMM and Floyd, can still trouble him?
:rofl That racist piece of **** Hoe Mackkkenzie voted Pacquiao. Anybody but a ni33er, right, Hoe? :yep
Both of them are pieces of **** with zero respect for the fans worldwide & they are not the best p4p kings we`ve ever had either, not even in my lifetime.... Whitaker & Chavez would spank both of them prime vs prime, those guys were real elite ATGs, superb fighters that could have avoided each other if they liked but had the ambition of legends & gave the fans a mega p4p clash.
Marco Antonio Barrera: the most skilled fighter I have ever seen. Perhaps Marco did not have the Physical Attributes to beat the likes of a Pacquiao, but Marco kept getting better ever time he fought. Marco was a Master Boxer - a student of the game.
Take it you haven`t been following boxing long then, Jim ? Ps. don`t get me wrong, Barrera was a superbly skilled fighter but there have been others, even in Marco`s own era, that were more skilled.