who is the better fighter

They are both awesome. You can argue either way.

I think Oscar is a more complete fighter. He has a way better chin. The ability to use different tactics. In most of his losses, Oscar was always competative. Though, Hopkins was breaking him down and took nim out. Tito was completely owned by B-hop and again by Winky.
Also, I tend to think Oscar should have gotten the decision against Tito.

 

I had De La Hoya winning their fight 116-112. De La Hoya is the better fighter

 

De la Hoya is better.

 

Delahoya.

Both by resume and head to head.

 

its ashame that people will look at DLHs resume years from now and see he lost 2 the biggest names on his resume (hopkins, trinidad, mosley, mayweather). but alot of people agree he won 1 against shane and won against trinidad. people even say he won against floyd(wtf).

 

DLH lost both times against Mosely.

And gave away the fight against Tito by running for the last few rounds.

 

Without a doubt ODLH.

 

De La Hoya by far, he gave Trinidad a lesson in 99 117-111 by my scorecard.
Should have been a rematch in 2000 but what can you do?
DLH resume is better and he really is the better boxer.

 

atsch

 

Oscar De La Hoya

 

I had trinidad beating him too, he gave up the last 4 rounds. Lost rounds 2, 5 and 6 in my opinion. The judges gave tito the win, harold lederman saw it as a draw, so yeah i wouldnt call it a robbery if 4 men that sat ringside saw it and none of them gave it to de la hoya. Foreman also thought de la hoya didnt win, thats 5.

 

dlh because he's more versatile mainly

 

:roll: Rounds five and six??
That's when DLH was giving Trindad the boxing lesson of a life time!
Trinidad did not win a round until the 10th! this was one of DLH's best performances clouded by the last three rounds. Well 3 rounds do not win a fight and Trinidad looked second rate prior to the 10th round.

 

Delahoya ..