Who is the bigger draw? Marquez or Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Nov 21, 2009.


  1. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I'd probably say Marquez is more proven and after his tremendous performances against Diaz and Casamayor, he had a lot more stock going into his last fight against Mayweether, than Cotto did against Pacquiao.

    But quite simply, who is the bigger draw?
     
  2. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Cotto by a little. But not by 250,000.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cotto and it's not even close. The Mayweather PPV numbers was by far the highest he made selling a fight, the Pac rematch was $400k and the Chris John fight made $0.
     
  4. LastQuark

    LastQuark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,928
    0
    Apr 29, 2006
    Puerto Rico population - 3.6 million
    Mexicans in the USA - 11 million

    Draw your own conclusion.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    probably the same. marquez was p4p#2 and cotto was a well known welter. both have an entire country supporting them.
     
  6. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    Cotto gets a big crowd in the east no matter who he fights. Marquez only really draws when in against a big name. It's Cotto, hands down.
     
  7. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    The Chris John fight is irrelevant. Marquez was largely unknown at that time. That's like someone using the Baldomir fight to show that Mayweather isn't a draw.
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    No contest . . . Cotto.
     
  9. pavlikfan

    pavlikfan Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    Marquez on Mexican independence day...remember they postponed the fight to that weekend for a reason.
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I think they're very comparable.

    The Pacquiao-Cotto fight did a little bit more than Mayweather-Marquez because the Pacquiao-Cotto fight was looked upon to the masses as a better matchup.

    When you look at the fact that a great majority of people viewed the Marquez-Mayweather fight as a physical mismatch, its actually pretty impressive that their ppv buys exceeded 1 million.


    It all depends on the matchups.....for intance, Mayweather-Cotto imo would have sold more than Mayweather-JMM........


    .......and on the flipside, Pacquiao-JMM would have sold more than Pacquiao-Cotto.

    People try to equate PPV buys with one particlar fighter, when its actually the matchup that has just as much if not more to do with the buy rate.
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    marquez aint selling out the garden in NY
    like cotto can do rather quickly
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    good post. but the HBO and GBP did a good job hyping the floyd-jmm fight.
     
  13. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    That says it all. 11mil mexicans in the US, the best mexican fighter fighting on mexican independance day.

    We dont even need to argue this, we only need listen to Floyd himself. Skip to 3.35!

    [yt]_sfM0PxaD3c[/yt]
     
  14. g.dog

    g.dog Active Member Full Member

    578
    1
    Jun 20, 2009
    cotto big buisness at the garden. i vote cotto
     
  15. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Cotto is a bigger draw. Marquez is a guy who is overrated a little.