Who is The Greatest Asian Fighter of All time???

Bruce Lee

 

You think because you went to boxrec you got the better of Sweat Pea? atsch

Dude....we all see how pointless it is dicussing anything with you. Besides, you really should not enter a discussion when it involves boxers you know nothing about. That's why you ask so many "Who he beat?" type of questions. All you know is Pac, and that's it.

 

if youre name is....
1. sweet pea
2. huki
3. divac
4. red manure
5. tffp whatever

in this forum, then rest assured 99.99 % all the time it is against pac trust me. :yep look at their posts about eons ago, the style and stupidity doesnt change. I am not making up, just dig in their posts

 

Are you saying that because you see them as VERY Anti Pacquiao, there is no point in having a logical discussion about Pacquiao? (I don't see many being anti Pacquiao in this thread for the record....if you ask a question and Pacquiao is not the answer you come up with, that doesn't make you anti Pacquiao)

 

If you're name is johnco...you don't know squat about any boxer other then Pac. I am not making that up. Just dig up johnco's posts.:yep

 

Bruce Lee, no contests

 

WHy don't you tell us all why Pac is the greatest Asian fighter ever. Give us examples why and please, discuss the other Asian boxer in the mix and why they aren't greater. Thanks in advance.

 

no no no. sweet pea is the knowledgeable of the bunch. but you know their history about pac. their manly love for my boy is not warm :-(

 

chinese asians are better than pakistani asians

 

:good checkout post # 32 :deal

 

I'm glad to be on a list associated with a difference of opinion with johnco. Opposing johnco ensures you are right by default.

We should all favour Pacquiao because he isn't from 'eons' ago. Or perhaps we're all biased against Pacquiao, because we are all Japs and love Harada :nut

That **** is very very weak. So tell us about the achievements of Elorde/Harada, and why they do not compare favourably to Pacquiao. Preferably without the use of boxrec, as believe it or not it doesn't prove **** or particularly strengthen your argument

 

Ok, but I know PacD's history about Pacquiao, and his manly love, as you put it, is piping hot. So he isn't objective at all.

And for the record, PacD knew nothing about Hertada when ACB asked about him. ACB displayed no hatred towards Pacquiao. PacD entered that thread about Rings 80 Greatest fighters and Duran's place on the list and said that Pacquiao should be at least #32 (or 33) because he was the greatest Asian fighter ever and should be ahead of Harada. But he knew nothing about Harada, thus the firestorm.

You gotta know when to stay out of PacD's situations. He is not always right. In this case, he created his own situation because he didn't have the information to argue his point, but wanted to argue it anyways.

 

lol this is funny:rofl