Who is the greatest heavyweight boxer that ever lived,Ali,Joe Louis Or Rocky Marciano

Lol, Sanders lost to Nate Tubbs! His only top 10 win ever was over Wlad!

 

:huh

He was born in Manchester, and lives in Cheshire. Both places are in ENGLAND.

Perhaps you ought to get out of area 51 more.

 

The ONLY thing Roid Jones would pull is OUT of a fight with Ali. Ffs he didn't even man up enough to fight the best L / Heavies, just made a load of feeble excuses. So feeble even his pay masters got ****ed off with him.

 

Just because you're born in a stable dosn't make you a horse

Tyson Fury is irish

You need to study the differences between races

You're race does not depend on the location of your birth

He is a member of the irish race who happens to be a British national

Nationalism is a concept

Racial origin is a fact

Most Brits hate him and call him a pikey

 

Yeah damn auto correct. I guess that makes your totally forgetting the original argument a wash doesnt it?

Actually when 4 of the 5 explicit checks for the ref are for head trauma yes it is.

Since you are a dumb**** it obviously never occurred to you that your Gatti example is actually the responsibility of the doctor not the ref.

You have to understand that despite your pathology you aren't that smart.

 

Ah dip**** two forgets the original argument because dip**** 1 has run off on a dozen tangents.

 

And obviously you dont understand boxing as only the ref can stop the fight. So the Gatti example holds true. Smarten up kid, you're getting beaten pillar to post. :-(

 

Schmeling have 7 loses when he beat Louis.
Sanders also was a World Champ, when he beat Wladimir. Schmeling was 87kg., dude he wont be even in the HW division omg .... And he will beat a guy like Sanders, who have speed, power, reach and height advantage, o yeah, that for sure ....
And where you see i say Wlad is prime now ? Klitschko prime physical, tactically and mentally was 2006/7-2012 ....

I know you dont like Klitschko, that is obvious from your posts for him, not only in this thread. Same as Dino.
I can agree with your top 5-10 ATG, cause everyone have opinion in that matter and like they say 10 different people can put 10 different guys into the rating.

 

Lennox Lewis and the Klitchkos beat little ass Marciano and Louis in the same night.

 

so what, he was undisputed world champion previously too.

see, this is your teleological fail in your argument - corrie became world champ ONLY because wlad gave this retiree a title shot AND subsequently lost (in seconds) to him.
Max won the title outright, not because the world champ was cowardly enough to face a retiree and **** enough to lose to a retiree.

now, don't pretend that even prime corrie is beating max, nevermind the shot2shyte retired one who killed wlad in bare seconds.

in between his losses and his prolonged retirement? I see. HA.
Stick the corrie loss or any of the other journeymen losses into those years though, and you'll change your mind fast.

 

From the rule book

"either the Referee or the Ringside Physician may stop the bout."

It would be a massive legal liability if the referee were the sole decision maker on such issues. Do you have any idea how much legal **** a boxing comission would be in if the ref was allowed to overrule the physician and something happened. That you would even think a ref was allowed to overrule the ringside physician just shows again how stupid you are.

'And Jab runs himself into the post.'

 

Sorry but the sanctioning org has the final say on who can stop the fight, not your ABC rulebook. Per the WBC, "only the referee can stop the fight". This is why you never hear it announced during a fight that either doctor or referee can stop a fight, it always "only the referee can stop the fight". The can of course accept a doctors advice to stop a fight, but the ref has the final say. So as usual you're wrong again.

 

First you are probably reading another simplified online version. Does it say simplified or synthesis. I'm betting it does.

Second lol you are such a shmuck. The sanctioning orgs are not superior the the comissions. The comissions are legal bodies established by the local governments. They have real legal authority behind them.

Any rule conflict between them and the sanctioning body its the comission who wins. I'm sure that clause is in your synthesized WBC rules because it's in all of them.

'Jab knocks himself out again. It amazing how many times a fighter can run himself into a ring post Larry. And the amazing thing is he doesn't realized he's already been KOed multiple times.'

 

You keep talking out your ass but you provide no proof. Oh thats right, you want us to take the word of a liar! All my facts can be checked. Conveniently yours cant.

 

No I'm asking you. You claim to have the WBC rules. I asked you to look at your source for the clause that says the comissions rules trump the sanctioning body. Proper rules of debate you introduced a source. I'm free to ask you more questions from your source. Now of course I know the clause is there because I've read it. But it was you who introduced that the sanctioning bodies are superior to the comissions. Therefor the onus is on you to prove that.

Quit running into the ring post.