Who is the greatest heavyweight boxer that ever lived,Ali,Joe Louis Or Rocky Marciano

Imagine you saying the onus is on me when youve ducked my questions, lied and provided no proof of your own?

Unlike you though I dont run when asked questions. Rule WC-1:In the event of an inconsistency of the rules of the local commision and the rules contained herein, and the WBC has agreed to proceed With the bout being a WBC sanctioned bout. The local commision will e responsible for enforcing its own rules and regulations, and the WBC will reserve its right to take any actions or decisions to resolve any controversy as it may deem Necessary and appropriate.

So as can plainly be seen, again, you're wrong. Im not saying the commision has no power, but it appears they are in agreement with the sanctioning bodies and their rules far more often than not. So it looks like you are still wrong. But if you would like to resolve this we can make a little wager if you'd like. Lets bet that the loser has to stay off this site for a week and when he comes back must appologise to the other for being a moron in this thread when he does come back. What we have to do....lets see who can post more fights introducing the rules with the announcer saying for me "only the referee can stop the fight" and for you the announcer saying "only the referee or doctor can stop the fight". Are you game or are you going to keep chasing your tail while trying to weasle out of things? Man up!!

 

A little psychology on the pathology of sociopaths. I gave the ABC rules you went out on Google looking for anything. That's understandable. You found some synopsis WBC rules. Now the first thing you have to prove is that the sanctioning bodies trump the comissions. Kind of hard when you consider that sanctioning bodies are private while the comissions are established by the power and authority of the government.

But here is where the pathology of a sociopath comes into play. The sanctioning bodies have to trump the comissions because you can't be wrong. The proof is your own infallibility. You said only the ref can stop the fight. The ABC says the physician can aswell. The WBC rules you found said only the ref. Therefor since you can't be wrong the WBC rules have to trump the comissions. This is classic sociopathy. Beware anyone who sees their own infallibility as evidence.

 

Uh that doesn't say you are right it says you are wrong. The sanctioning body will enforce it's own rules. The only thing a sanctioning body can do is play with the belt. The comission has all the power because they have the legal authority. Is a promoter chosesto ignore a comission in favor of a sanctioning body the comission can strip him of his license. Sanctioning bodies have 0 authority.

As for your bet, why? You are a sociopath. You will never admit you were wrong. You've been KOed in this argument dozens of times and you still think you are winning.

 

Lmao at all your drivel and side stepping! Its not that i cant be wrong, its that you are wrong. The commisions are in agreement with the sanctioning orgs rules more times than not. If they werent you would man up and accept my challenge. We both know why you wont though. Funny thing is, with all you blathering about how Ali would have been stopped if that fight were today i went and watched the 9th round of Gatti-Ward again. Fact is Gatti was in far worse shape than Ali and the fight was allowed to continue. Everything you have posted in this thread was for the simple reason of Putting Ali down. You have been rebuffed and proven wrong at EVERY turn yet you want to claim others cant be wrong. You're a joke kid!! :rofl

 

What does it matter if they are in agreement more times than not. What matters is that when they are in disagreement the comission is the greater authority.

 

Stop being a punk and take the bet than. If im wrong you have nothing to be afraid of. You wont though because you're a *****!

 

Why? You are a sociopath. You just posted the clause I said was there and still believe you were correct. You are pathology will never allow you to admit you were wrong. You cant have a gentlemen's wager with an abject sociopath.

 

It says the commision will be resposible for enforcing their own rules and regulations. How are they enforcing them if the give the ABC orgs free reign? The only logical answer are they re in agreement. If not we would here the announcers say "the ref and ringside doctor can only stop the fight". You know this hardly ever if at all happens. If I were wrong you would take the bet. I guess a punk will always be a punk though and cower away from a challenge.

 

How do they enforce them??? Uh everyone who works in the business is licensed by the comissions. The fighters, the trainers, the judges, the promoters, the cutmen, the doctors, the refs. You don't follow their rules you don't ****ing work.

The comissions have all the power. They run boxing not the sanctioning bodies. The only power the sanctioning bodies have is handing out belts.

 

Ok, fair enough. Than why in most fights is it announced "only the ref can stop the fight"? And why would you make the false claim it was the doctors responsibility to stop the Gatti-Ward fight and not the refs? Are you saying its only the refs job to enforce the rules? If so i have another link that says you're wrong.

 

Simplicity.

Because the ref is not a doctor. Hurting from a body blow falls under injury. Injuries are the generally left up to the call of the physician.

 

Show in your ABC rule book where it says this please. I already know it doesnt and so do you. So why dont we get back to the original debate about how you think The Ali-Cooper fight would have been stopped today? If you really think that than you must think there are hundreds of fights that should have been stopped early in the last 20 years. Correct?

 

He edited this too lol... Cooper stops Ali in 2003.

 

Ali.