[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz9OsDjPmzk[/ame] check out this video you joke. Augie came to the table, augie got knocked out, at least he came to the table. MAB kept well away from the Prince when he was at his peak, and when he split with Brendan Ingle and the superstardom got to him, thats when he got lazy and wasnt the same prince. Believe what you like you prince haters, Barrera wuda SPARKED out. Barreras best shots in his fight couldnt knock down Naz, and that was Naz on the decline, what makes you think he would have won if he fought Naz at his peak?
I'd pick Marvin Hagler to beat both and Roy Jones jr and Bernard Hopkins (who I both rate very highly, check my post in the past about them) Marvin Hagler is a true all time great, Its amazing that he did'nt go down from that straight right that Hearns hit him with.( who had one of the most powerful right hands in history, he knocked out lightheavy's with that shot check his record).
I just don't agree,Bernie.I believe that both Hopkins and Jones were excellent at middleweight and beyond,but Hagler's best victories other than Hearns came before he won the title.And by the time he faced Leonard,he was absolutely shot.Look at his refexes against Mugabi:slow as molasses.And he has a better resume at middleweight than both Jones and Hopkins even though Hopkins has the record for consecutive defenses.Funny how looking at both Jones and Hagler,they were both shot at 33,whereas Bernard's career as a champion was rolling along after that age.But people forget that Marvin had 67 fights by the time he turned 33.Despite their longevity-although in Roy's case,many of those years have been spent with Roy clearly shot-Marvin had what?-at least 10 more fights than either one.
Because Barrera outboxed her ass so ridiculously easy.Barrera fought a smart,calculated fight,something hamed was unaccustomed to responding too.By the way,who is hamed's greatest victory against?Shot Kelly,Bungu,Sanchez,no power bantamweight McCullough,33 year old Johnson?Ridiculous.Did you know that Sanchez lost 3 times by brutal knockout,the hamed fight being the second?In each brutal knockout,Sanchez had to be stretchered out of the ring.Barrera waited for hamed to be finished?Hahahaha.When they fought,hamed was 27.That really constitutes shot hahaha.You hamed supporters are so full of excuses it's ridiculous.
Well said.Marquez is still furious at hamed because she ducked JMM for 2 years while JMM was #1 contender for hamed's alphabet belt.
here you go you twat, have a look at this video and save it in your favourite. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnOwaNY_cds[/ame] Not physically, he was mentally out of boxing, he was BORED, cant you read check out his interview i posted earlier? you make me laugh.
I make you laugh?Why the **** would I want to listen to that ******* speak?As if raging egomaniac hamed would ever admit anyone's better than her anyway.hamed is a walking excuse,always has been,always will be.Ever since Barrera kicked her ass.I hated listening to her when she was on the go,she was such a ****ing classless scumbag ****.Why the **** would I want to listen to her speak now while she's making excuses?I'm a twat?What is absolutely hilarious is that you actually take what comes forth from your bigmouth scumbag idol's shithole in the middle of her face as if it were the whole truth and nothing but the truth,haha.That absolutely has to be one of the top 5 insane excuses ever in boxing:"I lost because I was bored."Do you have any idea how ludicrous that sounds?You are one pathetic ******* just for taking what that scumbag says in her excuse seriously.Stupid ****ing ****.
you *****, what 'little prince big fight' on youtube. This is a build up documentary prior to the Naz MAB fight. The prince hardly trains for the fight, noody is pushing him and he's lazying around, too busy picking his hotel and stuff. You telling me thats a prime naz? he even got beaten in sparring and didnt look the same. Now, the prince didnt even train for the MAB fight, and took him 12 rounds, and the scorecards weren't even THAT one sided: 116-111, 115-112, 115-112. I would say that aint bad for the prince, who TOTALLY relied on his power in his last few fights and didnt even bother boxing. Well, his is the 46 greatest puncher of ALL TIME, what can you say? you twat.
JMM turned down Hamed Twice!! Get ur facts right, Nacho even admitted it! LINK http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/Aug-26-Sat-2000/sports/14250555.html Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Hagler first by a huge margin, and then Whitaker. Hagler in his prime was the greatest middleweight, and possibly the greatest boxer of all time. Even when he was shot and slowed down, he was still the best middleweight of a great era.
when Pac retires, people will talk about him in the same breath as Hagler and Pernell. Esp. if he beats Cotto. Right now he is still active and its hard to judge a fighter when they are active.