Who Is The More Complete Fighter - Pavlik Or Kessler?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Oct 26, 2008.


  1. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Exactly. That's why I don't understand all the bashing for Pavlik by a lot of people, it's so unfair. If one had seen Kelly fight, they should have known his weaknesses long before the Hopkins fight. Pavlik is not so good as far as pure skill is concerned, and we all know how Bernard makes his opponents look. ;)
     
  2. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    It's a shame what they've become... :verysad

    No, I didn't. :blood
     
  3. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008
    :rofl
     
  4. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Obviously Hopkins fought the perfect fight but there are definitely things you can take from it. It really highlighted just how reliant he is on having a solid base to throw from, when someones standing right in front of Kelly, he is going to pump the jab and load up a big right hand. Any lateral movement is going to trouble his jab, though no one can do it quite like Hopkins obviously. Kelly is too textbook for his own good, which is what i think you are getting at, as the book goes, he looks very good. His punching technique is awesome and he sets things up off the jab, but he lacks the athletic ability to change that up, if someone can make his jab less effective, he is going to be **** out of luck.

    Kessler is fast enough to throw lead left hooks and other less orthodox combinations and he can also punch a lot more effectively reguardless of what his base is doing. Thats where Kelly gets into a lot of trouble, if someone moves rapidly in any direction out of his punching range (which is certainly a big one) he can't follow them and still throw, he has to get back in range and reset his feet, and rinse and repeat.

    Pavlik's next fight against a top fighter will certainly be interesting, to see how he bounces back, and also to see if anyone else is going to be good enough to take his jab away from him or at least incorporate some good movement and give his offensive game trouble. Its almost sad how badly his fans have desserted him, especially considering he still has a redhot chance at becoming the undisputed MW champ.
     
  5. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    hmm...think i accidentally hit undecided, but i'd say mikkel kessler is more complete.....

    pavlik is far from being complete, he's just a 1-2 fighter with power....
     
  6. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Hey, theres hope. Lebron might go there soon. Keep your head up. :good
     
  7. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005

    well after b hop ouclassed kelly its easy to say kessler right ? should have sk that before that his fight with hopkins.i bet alot of people would have sayed something different then what they are saying now.

    anyways i think kessler is a tad bit better TECHNICAL FIGHTER.i still think kelly its harder and can fight harder.
     
  8. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Oh well, one can only hope...

    Ok, lets stop "trashing" Rafa's thread now. ;)
     
  9. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    :good :good :good (GO LAKERS)
     
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Good post, I agree with most of it. We differ slightly on Kessler's ability to throw shots in transition. You've got the two reversed in the middle paragraph for my taste. It's Mikkel that has the greater trouble. You're still working directly off the established playbook of the Hopkins fight alone - though in fairness I can't ask you not to do so. If that's what he's judged by, that's what he's judged by.
     
  11. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    The results are far more interesting now though, but yes, I'm sure they would have looked very different.
     
  12. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Kessler for now. I feel Kelly isnt done developing and that we've seen the "best" Kessler by now....Both are very good and both are deficient in some areas
     
  13. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
    Quoting an old post:

    Handspeed:

    Kessler, not even close, why argue with obvious reality!

    Footwork:

    People said, before the Calzaghe fight that if Cal was able to get inside Kessler he would win by a mile, because Kessler wasnt able to box backfoot - turned out not to be true, at least kind of - Kesslers timing allowed him to keep hes stance timing Calzaghe coming in.

    Pavliks footwork look a little heavy - fact is we dont really know yet.

    Power:

    Pavlik - Probably even, but lets assume that Pavlik carries his power up in weight.

    Timing:

    Kessler by a mile.

    Defence:

    Kessler easily.

    Overall tecnical skills:

    Kessler easily.

    Heart:

    Pavlik, Kessler has a heart but a case could be made that he didnt go all in against Calzaghe. Pavlik surely wouldnt mind being KO trying to win.



    Result:

    Kessler 70/30
     
  14. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Now for an unbiased version......
    Timing: Neither Kessler or Pavlik rely much on timing. This is an obvious reality and should at best be even.

    Defense: Again neither have a superb defense but when it all comes down to it Kesslers hands for the most part are kept quite low. Aside from this Kessler is quite stationary with no real movement going on. Pavlik on the other hand has a decent guard and is decent at slipping and parrying....Pavlik wins here

    Technical skills: Roughly even but I do give Kessler the advantage here but not by much or even a mile:good
     
  15. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
    Kessler has great timing, that combined with his great sense of distance actually makes the very spine of his defense.

    You must be joking to give defense to Pavlik! Watch the Miranda match again! Kessler doesnt get hit much. Pavlik on the other hand, likes his chin to be tested once in a while:hey

    Technical skills: Please!