Who is the more versatile/adaptable fighter? Mayweather or Calzaghe?

Well like I said . . . no contest. PBF fought different fighters with all sorts of fighting styles in different weight classes.

 

Calzaghe is a very good fighter though. I had my doubts until I saw him dismantle Kessler.

I don't give a **** who anybody is, if they don't think he did a great job and saw that he's one of the all time great fighters, they don't have any business voicing your opinion.

But yeah, like you said, Floyd has shown more versatility.

 

Floyd is a very good fighter, one of the best of all time, but if you really think that about Calzaghe, slap yourself.

atsch

 

Oh yes . . . we cannot deny that Calzaghe is a very good fighter. But comparing versatility against PBF is another issue. :yep

 

Yeah, as much as I sound like a hater of PBF, I actually think he's a very good fighter.

I just wish that people would acknowledge that he's not infalible and that he did duck Margarito.

 

i think this thread should be "who do you prefer to watch" or "who do you like better" versatile depends on what type of fighter you like most. I love to watch floyd because he is a master of the game, but i would rather watch a calzaghe fight. Period he doesnt need 24/7.

 

Oh believe me . . . I was one of the people here who's clamoring for that fight. :yep

And no matter what PBF accomplished . . . nobody can change the fact that he did . . . ducked Marg.