So...Wlad hits and doesn't get hit? Using his jab effectively one migh say he has it down to almost a "science"? hmmm...
You completely disregarded my point, sure he doesn't get hit but it's not because of great timing, defense, footwork or lateral movement. It's because of reach. He is a good technical fighter don't get me wrong but I just don't like his approach, it's boring to me. That's all.
it is boring, but corrie sanders had a lotto do with changes he had to make regarding that. it's also to be admired big time that he recovered from the sanders demolition to redefine himself. mentally, that's a difficult thing to overcome
Bernard Hopkins for me. His constant spoiling and cheating is unbearable to watch at times. Plus Max Kellerman gets a boner over him because he is in absolute awe of his 'achievements' at such an old age. B-Hop king of spoliers.
i agree to an extent but Bhops fights with tito and Pavlik werent snooze fests. the only fight i can remeber Wlad being entertaining is when Colonel Sanders knocked him out
His reach is just slightly above his opponent's average it seems. W. Klitschko 81 How that compares with his notable opponents. Haye 78 Peter 77 Chambers 77 Chagaev 74 Rahman 82 Thompson 81 1/2 Ibramimov 76 Brewster 77 Austin 80 Brock 77 Byrd 74 Williamson 80 McCline 82 Sanders 77 Mercer 77 Shufford 80 Jefferson 82 Barrett 78 Wolfgramn 80 Shulz 76 Then looking at some of the other greats. It seems pretty average amongst them. Ali 80 Louis 76 Marciano 67 Patterson 71 Holmes 81 Lewis 84 Frazier 73 Johnson 74 Liston 84 Vitali 80 Tyson 71 Foreman 82 Max Baer 81 Bowe 81
Im kinda confused on what Vitali is doing on the list. Direll is probably the most boring out of that list to me.
Sturm followed by Wlad and Ward All the other options are great to watch IMO, anyone that appreciates the sweet science loves watching Mayweather, B-Hop and Dirrell