Who is the msot technically perfect active fighter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 18, 2007.

  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,633
    Likes Received:
    47,322
    In your opinion?
     
  2. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    forgot my basics...
     
  3. Kojiro

    Kojiro Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    PBF obviously. :deal
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,919
    Likes Received:
    2,383
  5. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    8,957
    Likes Received:
    109
    Bernard Hopkins
     
  6. thunder06

    thunder06 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    19
  7. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    Wake up people . . . there's no such thing as technically perfect fighter. All fighters have flaws . . . reason why all fighters gets bruises, lumps, marked face or even bloodied.

    That should be repraised to "close to being perfect".:hey

    :D
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,633
    Likes Received:
    47,322
    All you guys picking Mayweather - what is it about his footwork/head movement/glove positioning that you find technically perfect?

    Very, very efficient and effective but you won't find it in any manual.

    Some of the other calls are great though.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,633
    Likes Received:
    47,322

    "Most technically perfect".

    I think that's pretty straigt forward, even though it doesn't make a huge amount of sense.

    I'm not suggesting a technically perfect fighter exsists, just starting a conversation about technical excellence in active fighters.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,633
    Likes Received:
    47,322
    Well said; though I wouldn't put Hopkins in with Toney and Mayweather. I also think fluidity isn't neccesary for near-technical perfection, but this is an excellent post...

    The guys picking Mayweather, i'm intrigued - why? Care to explain your position?
     
  11. DonPrestige

    DonPrestige Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,143
    Likes Received:
    0
    MOST technically perfect damn, read before before you try to be a smart arse.



    PBF
     
  12. VIP

    VIP Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    2
    Winky Wright is up there. Punching technique straight from the textbooks.
     
  13. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,499
    Likes Received:
    10
    LOL nobodys perfect!!!!

    best technically would be much appropriate i should say and thats pbf for sure, second would be that guy who ktfo darchinyan.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,633
    Likes Received:
    47,322
    For punching I think you are absolutley right.

    Damn!, still loads of guys picking PBF without saying why!
     
  15. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hey **** you newbie . . . i know how to read **** head. Is there an "arse" word in the dictionary?

    Now you shut the **** up.:-(