Who is the msot technically perfect active fighter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 18, 2007.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins by a landslide
     
  2. *BOX_FAN*

    *BOX_FAN* Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    Ronald "Winky" Wright
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,839
    34,811
    Jun 23, 2005
    Calderon
    Hopkins
    JMM
    PBF
    Wright
     
  4. Johnnyblaze

    Johnnyblaze Active Member Full Member

    1,052
    6
    Mar 1, 2006
    I have a couple

    Hopkins-He does everything right. In my opinion, he dosen't do anything spectacular. He just does everything textbook and that's why he has had such great sucess.

    Floyd-His style isn't textbook, but he has mastered his technique. Especially his defense. His "shoulder roll" defense is the best i've ever seen.

    Winky-Hands up, pinpoint accurate jabs that he uses for offense and defense. Just like Hopkins, nothing spectacular, just does everything right.
     
  5. codeman99998

    codeman99998 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,713
    1
    Aug 28, 2006
    Here is a defense for Mayweather (I pretty much think Raf Marquez is the absolute best technically, but here it goes.)

    Not all techniques are the same. Just because no one teaches the philly shell in a boxing 101 textbook does not mean it is a technically flawed approach, just a different one. James Toney was not exactly a prime physical specimen ever since he left middleweight, but he still used those techniques to pull out victories.

    PBF is not RJJ. RJJ relied on outstanding physical abilities to win fights with a total lack of any really solid technique. Floyd supplements his amazing technique with outstanding physical abilities.

    Floyd's defense allows him to stand right in front of you and he dodges/deflects most of your punches. It is not purely athletic talent that is doing it, but skill in his defensive techniques.

    There is more than one way to fight. Some fighters appear to have "poor" footwork, but they win almost all of their fights. Perhaps the reason is because their "poor" footwork is allowing them to get maximum leverage on all of their punches, but it limits their mobility.

    Some fighters may have a "poor" stance, with their hands not necessarily held high. But perhaps their stance is allowing them to more effectively punch from different angles, or counterpunch with more power.

    Some fighters may have "poor punching form", but perhaps their form allows them to significantly increase their punch output.

    Pretty Boy Floyd's style will not be found in any boxing 101 book, but he has totally and completely mastered it. While he may not be "the most perfect" at "how a fighter should fight" he certainly has mastered doing what he does very well, and he clearly gets substantial advantages over his opponent by doing what he does. Floyd would not be as good of a fighter if he was fighting from the boxing 101 textbook.

    *edit* On an unrelated note, I see absolutely no way that anyone can say Winky Wright is the most technically perfect. Every time that guy goes into fight his gloves are so big they are like SHIELDS. He only throws straight punches (not exactly the sign of a fighter with a full arsenal.) He has a great physical advantage because his forearms are so big compared to his chest that he is able to completely cover up almost every inch of his body any time he wants to. A boxing novice can be tought how to fight like Winky Wright (obviously he wouldn't become a boxing champion because he doesn't have the experience or the physical advantages) in about 20 minutes. The guy is near unbeatable, but skilled?

    Just because you win fights without knocking out your opponent doesn't make you skilled.
     
  6. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,776
    549
    Jul 11, 2006
    joel casamayor should get a good mention...can throw every punch correctly has great movement and technique
     
  7. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    i think you should have used Most well rounded SKILLED fighter instead of technical...technical is such a broad term.

    Without a doubt though PBF is the most well rounded skilled fighter today.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  9. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    good point about power and coombo's....very good point cant argue that....but like you said he is out his weight class really so he does have power just not at these weights and thats the same for combos to i think but i see your point.
     
  10. Tettsuo

    Tettsuo Active Member Full Member

    785
    126
    Jun 27, 2005
    B-Hop and Floyd... and just a mention for Winky.

    In Floyd's defense, his punching technique is perfect, along with his footwork which is also extremely good. You can check out his recent match against Judah (after he switched up tactics) and see where he's using just basic technique to beat on Judah noggin'. He cuts off the ring extremely well. His defense my seem unorthodox if you're only looking at his torso, but his footwork is totally correct. The only thing I don't like are his leaping left hooks. Left hooks are best when you're firmly planted on the ground.

    BHop does everything perfect. He even cheats perfectly. He needs to do it all very well to makeup for his lack of outstanding power and speed.

    Winky punches very well, but I don't like his wide stance. I understand he needs such a wide stance to absorb punches, but it also forces him to plod forward. I also don't like his lack of commitment to his punches. But again, I understand that he needs to do that so he can get his guard up quickly. So I'm on the fence regarding Winky.
     
  11. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    Technically perfect, now that would depend on the fighters style or it would depend on how the fighter throws punches, stands, recovers, holds his guard, parries, bobs, weaves, blocks, guards etc.

    IMO there are many styles out there that work extremely well if used correctly and by the right type of fighter, in conjunction with things mentioned up top. Some guys have great quickness, so utilizing a lead left hook which would be a deffinate no no for many fighters would actually be a great weapon to be used technically for certain styles which take into consideration great quickness. Accuracy and athleticism and chin are other aspects. James Toney in his prime was one of those guys who could take a jab or a cross for example and set up combinations off of taking certain punches to land his own.

    This being said I really like James Toney, Floyd, MAB, Marquez's, a prime Forrest, and of all people Kessler. You can take a look at how successful fighters are as they age.. Once youth is out the door, technique is what tends to carry fighters into their mid to later years. Fighters need to utilize the correct style of fighting with technique in order to have successful careers. If you utilize techniques which play into your natural abilities extremely well, then you are going to have a successful career.

    So yeah, guys like BHOP and Barrera are extremely cerebral fighters, who's styles are based on what other fighters do. BHOP is a master at remembering patterns in his opposition, pulling the trigger at the right moment, finding openings. I think Barrera is similar but more offensively oriented when he is fighting at his best. JMM is in this category as well.

    Wright is based off of defense, pressure and chin.

    Forrest imo has the perfect counter style to quick fighters.. I think if there were a prime version of him around today he would have the bane style to Floyd Mayweather, working off the jab and big cross, controlling range.
     
  12. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Its Hopkins....by a mile.

    Floyd is great....but his defensive style is anything but textbook.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,633
    47,322
    Mar 21, 2007
    I know that, but thanks.

    My point wasn't that the guys i'm talking about actually get a MANUAL and start reading.

    My point was that there is a technically perfect way of throwing a jab, for example.

    I do like him. Do you think i'm attacking him by calling him less than technically perfect? Why do you think that?

    Ali, Roy Jones, there are many great fighters who are not technically excellent in many departments.

    I think this has been covered earlier in the thread.

    But thanks for pointing out to us all that fighters aren't robots.

    Maybe you should find somewhere else to post if you don't like it.

    I've boxed. Not going to be a world champ of anything, but i've done it. WTF has that got to with a chat about tecnical boxing?
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,633
    47,322
    Mar 21, 2007
    Good points.

    From the point of view of deploying techniques as perfectly as possible though, Toney is a difficult example - maybe the most difficult. But I agree with your basic point.

    I think PBF gets away with the hands low shoulder roll because of his astonishing athletecism in the same way that RJJ would. I do think that Floyd's basics are more sound than Roy's.



    Yes. The difference is that a technically perfect defensive roll will be just as effective when he is 45 and all his speed is gone, whereas what he does now is reliant on his speed. You know? That is why Hopkins is such a great example of near-technical perfection - he's over 40 and it's hurt him much less than his contemparies (Tarver, Johnson, Jones).

    Well they are different facets of technique (IMO) - one is leverage via positioning, the other is footwork related to mobility. I believe it is possible to do both well so I wouldn't look to a fighter getting great leverage because of his poor mobility as an example of great technique when it is possible (Dempsey, Sanchez, Barrera) to achieve both.



    Excellent post. Interesting stuff about Winky. I partially agree. I think that the punches he does throw are tecnhically near perfect though.
     
  15. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    +1

    1. Bernard
    2. JMM
    3. Mayweather(speed and natural gifts allow for mistakes).