Who is the next 39 old or 43 yr old boxer for CALZAGHE

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Silvermags, Nov 9, 2008.


  1. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    No, because Hopkins isn't close to shot you ****ing ******. :lol:

    Do you actually read posts before replying to them or twist words to make your feeble argument more 'credible'. :roll:
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,383
    Jan 6, 2007

    Aside from thinking 'bout them two young fellas (Kessler and Lacy), how did a close-to-shot Hopkins manage to shut out Taylor's two-time Daddy, Pavlik, the next big superstar ?


    Maybe Benard's NOT close to being shot ?
     
  3. maradona

    maradona Member Full Member

    159
    17
    Feb 18, 2007
    is this the same shot , over the hill hopkins that spanked the arse of the next great white hope kelly pavlik?
     
  4. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    This is exactly what they did to Lewis in fights against Holy and Tyson. Suddenly they were old and shot. Before, many said they would beat Lewis but then Lewis beat them like they stole something.

    There is no doubt that at 39 and 43, RJJ and X are not what they used to be but science would determine that Calzaghe isn't what he used to be. Both RJJ and X proved in the ring that they still had something. Calzaghe just whooped them.

    Calzaghe has proven he is simply that damn good.
     
  5. stakeout

    stakeout Active Member Full Member

    636
    0
    Jan 20, 2008
    Go ask your Yank hype job Pavlik about that. :rofl
     
  6. Cookie

    Cookie Active Member Full Member

    510
    0
    Feb 10, 2005
    :rofl
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    before that he fought undefeated and 26 year old jeff lacy and kessler....so we cant really go there
     
  8. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    kessler, lacy................
     
  9. badman

    badman Member Full Member

    244
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Calzaghe is just too good for any american.

    Get use to it!!!!
     
  10. badman

    badman Member Full Member

    244
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Calzaghe is no sprink chicken either!!!!
     
  11. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Right, Bernard Hopkins was at the time the best the division has to offer and is still fighting and beating the best in a stylish fashion. But Joe (age 36) shouln't fight him because...and ****ing hell...Roy Jones being all of 3 WHOLE YEARS older than Joe...what a ******* Joe is for fighting him..:patsch
     
  12. majorer

    majorer Member Full Member

    408
    1
    May 2, 2006
    :bbb

    Hello there you little ****** computer nerd. Sitting there behind your little computer, refusing to give credit where credit is due, critizising men who are out there doing something with their lives.

    Roy is 3 years older than JOe.

    And Hopkins is clearly not past it. Look at the Kelly fight. Did Hopkins grow younger in the time between fighting Calzaghe and Pavlik. :bbb :hi: :bbb :hi: :bbb :hi: :bbb
     
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Yup! 90% of CALZAGHE's fight was made in UK... only went out of UK his COMFORT ZONE when RJJ and HOPKINS were aleady past thier prime...

    He buddy! YOU MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN. RJJ was last 3 of his last 6 fights. You call that PRIME?!?:hey

    If you INSIST that losing 3 of the LAST 6 fights is a PRIME so be it :good
     
  14. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    talk about a failed thread!!
     
  15. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    HOPKINS is past HIS PRIME but STILL BETTER than PALVIC!!!

    So what's the problem?! :lol:

    I gave Joe his credit dude! GO look for it! Like I said A WIN IS A WIN :good

    but it's PLAIN STUPIDITY if you think winning from somebody who has lost 3 out of his 6 fights is CONSIDERED PRIME!