Who is the Onus of proof upon?? Manny or Accusers?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by slantone, Dec 22, 2009.


  1. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    just wanted to get more of a survey following on the last thread on whether Manny is doping- who do you feel the onus of proof is on??
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    I think the burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the accusers.

    I also think that the supposed benefits of steriods in boxing, as in other sports, are WAY over exaggerated. People act like this turns the Jimmy Youngs of the world into Earnie Shavers!! It's ****ing ridiculous!!! :patsch
     
  3. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    This isn't a court of law.

    As a professional athlete, especially in the modern era, you should want to leave no doubts about whether or not you are doping. Unless of course, you are something.