Who is the WORST challenger for a world title in HISTORY?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Mar 27, 2011.


Page 15 of 17
  1. Raskolnikov

    Raskolnikov Guest

    i have looked thru the thread.

    popkins is sayin the guy had the worst reason for gettin a title shot, coz his last 6 were so bad.

    how is posting the records a boxrec warrior? am i a boxrec warrior every time i mention a record, if i havent seen every fight in the record? if i say a guy who has a 20-15 record is too bad to get a title shot, am i a boxrec warrior coz i havent seen all his fights?
     
    Raskolnikov, Mar 29, 2011
    Raskolnikov, Mar 29, 2011
    #211
  2. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    How about Patrick Charpentier, who was De La Hoya's easiest mandatory as a welter champ. I remember that fight was in a stadium in San Antonio and Oscar carried him for a few rounds so's to keep the packed stadium happy having seen atleast a few rounds. When it was time to get Charpentier out of there Oscar did it easily, like he was fighting a 5 year old Charpentier was that much weaker and outclassed. Now that's what I call a bad challenger
     
    FORMIDABLE, Mar 29, 2011
    FORMIDABLE, Mar 29, 2011
    #212
  3. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    ifyou know nothing else about him other than his record & you make a thread about him calling him "the WORST challenger for a world title in HISTORY"...then yeah.
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #213
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    Stealing things you've seen a troll say = lower than a troll. Congrats :good

    ****ing pathetic.

    And you have been shamelessly ducking this even though I posted it about 8 times:

    I can continually post this, as there is no answer ploys can give to this which doesn't result in defeat for him by my logic:


    This content is protected




    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    #214
  5. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    what did i steal?

    & don't accuse me of ducking when you can't even answer point one autism boy.
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #215
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    And yet, his last 6 opponents before his title shot still makes him a disgraceful challenger for a world title. The point is still the same as it was on page 1. A guy with those last 6 opponents should NEVER have been fighting for a world title. You look like a biased moron even trying to debate that point. :smoke
     
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    #216
  7. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Patrick Charpentier's record before challenging Oscar:

    Rene Uranga 7-8-0 W KO 2
    Wayne Boudreaux 23-11-0 W TKO 6
    Virgil Petrache 2-6-1 W TKO 1
    Leroy Owens 14-14-3 W PTS 10
    Bobby Heath 10-5-2 D TD 4
    Manuel Hernandez 20-20-2 W TKO 2
     
    FORMIDABLE, Mar 29, 2011
    FORMIDABLE, Mar 29, 2011
    #217
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    You stole his ancient turgid patter, pretending you don't know is even more lame than the fact you actually started copying him. You really are exposing yourself as a total worm on this thread. :deal

    You conjured up your massive list of regurgitated already-rebuffed points a long time AFTER I had already been asking you that question, check back and prove me right (again).

    :smoke
     
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    #218
  9. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    he is a poor challenger for a world title based on "he's not very good" imo.

    durable but limited. very limited. but you wouldn't know any of that cos you've never seen him box.

    his fights leading up to the title shot don't make him good or bad on their own...especially as he didn't get his wbo ranking based on those fights...& they certainly aren't enough for anyone to make a value judgement on his ability based on never having seen any of them...unless you are autistic...like yourself.
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #219
  10. Raskolnikov

    Raskolnikov Guest

    ur talkin ****.

    so if i read on boxrec that a guy in 1962 got a shot when he had a 1-75-4 record, and i make a thread sayin he was the worst title challenger ever, i am a boxrec warrior, coz i havent seen all the fights?

    popkins, stop talkin with this dude. :nono
     
    Raskolnikov, Mar 29, 2011
    Raskolnikov, Mar 29, 2011
    #220
  11. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    i stole his "patter"? :lol:

    point 1? still ducking it?
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #221
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    I'm stopping shortly, as I've proven this chump wrong time and time again.


    Another layer to his insane p-o-v:

    EVERY person in the Classic Forum who says that Harry Greb has (a) one of the best resumes ever, or (b) is one of the greatest of all-time, is (by his stupid definition) a "boxrec warrior" since they haven't seen all of his fights, and all of his opponents' fights.
     
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    #222
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    Yes, you did steal it, you sad sad lower-than-a-troll worm. :smoke

    The posts I made before you came up with your bull**** list? Still avoiding them?
     
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    horst, Mar 29, 2011
    #223
  14. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    if you've never seen him fight...you can't make a judgement on how good or bad he is. you can say he was undeserving based on his record but you can't quantify his talent from some stats.

    what if someone who HAD seen him fight said to you "actually he was a good fighter...74 of those losses were robberies & the other was a close fight with an atg"; would you still call him the worst ever?

    you couldn't argue...cos you wouldn't know. :deal
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #224
  15. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    actually...

    that list was a list of points you have repeatedly ducked during this thread...

    before you started reposting that **** endlessly...like a troll

    (& btw...i have more than dealt with what you said in that post too...you're just ignoring the responses). :deal
     
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    ploys, Mar 29, 2011
    #225
Page 15 of 17