Who is the worst heavyweight champion in history?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SheenLantern, Apr 9, 2021.


  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,324
    11,716
    Mar 19, 2012
    Braddock, L. Spinks or Carnera
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think Ryan is somewhat underrated.

    He seems to have a good reputation in the sparring matches for a while, and was a big strong guy at 6 feet plus. The only pictures I know of are him hog fat, but at the time of those fights he seems to have been lean and in good shape.

    With his win over Goss I think he had as good a claim as anyone to being the best in the world, which also says a lot about the era, and I've seen him called World Champion in British papers, possibly due to the lack of a good British champion.

    He certainly had a harder time with Goss, than say Dwyer did with Elliot, but it's hard to say how much is the result of Goss being better than Elliot. I think it's a real shame the fight between Dwyer and Ryan never materialised for various reasons.
     
    The Senator and janitor like this.
  3. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,225
    Mar 22, 2015
    Martin, by a country mile.
     
  4. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Alphabet champions don’t count, so it’s not Martin. Kinda sad to see how many posters in classic seem to not grasp this. I don’t blame any of you, I blame the belts.

    Hart is a strong contender here as is Spinks.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  5. SheenLantern

    SheenLantern Active Member Full Member

    518
    900
    Jan 13, 2016
    The IBF is a major championship belt?
     
  6. Jason Thomas

    Jason Thomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,564
    5,288
    Feb 18, 2019
    I think Jackson was the #1 contender when Patterson defended against him. Jackson did poorly in that fight and fell apart afterward, but Patterson should not be criticized for this defense. London was a tune-up for Ingo. McNeeley sort of a tune-up for Liston. I think the tax situation at the time made it necessary for the Liston defense to be put off until 1962 so both men polished off pushovers to build interest.

    Patterson got a ton of deserved criticism for the Rademacher farce. It was a good financial but terrible legacy move. The 1958 avoidance of Eddie Machen also is hard to justify, although Roy Harris was a decent contender, undefeated with some good wins, and ranked #3.
     
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Not a single belt matters except for the lineal title. It makes older fighters look less accomplished when they can’t be considered “champions,” if they didn’t have the lineal title.

    That shouldn’t fly in the classic forum where cross-era comparisons are commonplace.
     
  8. BoxxyMcBoxface

    BoxxyMcBoxface Member Full Member

    104
    174
    Apr 13, 2020
    John Ruiz, Nikolai Valuev, or Bruce Seldon.
     
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,719
    Apr 20, 2010
    So if we're talking about middleweight champions, GGG can not be part of the discussion?
     
  10. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I have no clue bro, they ruined the sport.