Hopkins for ****ing sure!!! His resume and accomplishments speak volumes for a man his age. You won't realize how much you'll miss him after he retires.
This^^^....Even though I gave it to pacquiao, but its very very close.... Most people give it to pacquiao based on climbing the weight, and winning titles against elite fighters.... Mayweather has done the samething(130-154), just his resume is not as good as pacquiao's......Floyd's resume is still good, people think it is garbage, floyd has a quality resume.... Floyd only had 2 fights that were competitive.....the rest he has dominated, against world class opponents....maybe not as good as pacquiao "names".....but pacquiao has had some **** performances, sanchez(he quit and got a no contest), marquez he went life and death with X2(some feel he got 2 gifts).....he got rocked by larios, beat barrera the second time easily, but got rocked in roud 5 of that one....This is not a runaway for manny pacquiao...and the morales loss My top 3 of the decade 1. Pacquiao.. 2. Mayweather.................................... 3. Hopkins
1.Hopkins - Pacquiao 2. 3.Mayweather 4.Morales 5.Barrera 6.Marquez 7.Wright 8.Mosley 9.Calzaghe (how ever the **** you spell his name) 10.Castillo
I agree. Where I deduct Pacquiao points is fighting Morales for the 3rd fight where he looked like a skeleton literally and he was coming off of a loss. He lost the first fight fair and square. He knocked down JMM 3 times in their first fight and got his ass kicked for the remaining rounds. If you are anybody other than a ******* you seen that. His best wins were the first Barrera win, the second Morales win, Cotto of course. But he beat an already knocked out Hatton looking at retirement. He beat a really drained and a really past it ODH. David Diaz..the weakest of the lightweight title holders. If you really look into it he has the names but he got beat or was in close fights with every prime or near prime fighter he fought other than Barrera.