Who looked further past his best vs Contender comp: OSCAR v Forbes or SSM v Mora?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Sep 19, 2010.


  1. horst

    horst Guest

    This content is protected




    This content is protected



    Thoughts? :good
     
  2. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    At least Oscar beat Forbes, and pretty convincingly. Shane just looked completely shot.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    OK, we've had one explanation from someone who voted Shane.


    No explanation from those who voted Oscar? MichiganWarrior?
     
  4. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    Shane always would have looked shitty against Mora.
     
  5. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Oscar won every round.
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: Yeah, the Shane Mosley of 2000 who was stronger, more powerful, faster, a better puncher and a better boxer than Sergio Mora would have looked shitty against the peak version of Sergio Mora who was lucky as hell to escape with a decision after Peter Manfredo Jr beat the **** out of him.

    :patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  7. CYoungblood95

    CYoungblood95 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,969
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    oscar- he handpicked a smaller opponent and only won the fight off of pure agression...mosley on the other hand was fighting a much larger, slick fighter, and i believe mosley looked as bad as he did out of frustration not necessarily being shot, ie he left himself open and was running around slapping because he was frustrated because he couldnt get the guy to fight...both of these opponents were tough styles for both men at their respective stages of their careers.