Who looked the most impressive against Broner: Maidana, Porter, Garcia, or Pacquiao

He was far closer to his prime than Pac was.

 

Broner is still in his prime. He's 29 and hasn't been knocked out. He was in the best shape of his life, in the best mental state of his life, and was the hungriest against Pac.

 

With his trainer's help Maidana was a philly shell killer.
No one has landed so many over rights on Broner and Floyd like Maidana did.

 

Lol @ best shape of his life. Bro anybody that really knows boxing knows a 40 year old Pacquiao easily beat a fighter that was already exposed as an overhype in the 3 other loses in the past in broner. Anybody that really knows boxing knows Pacquiao pick Broner as a warm up fight for maybe a floyd rematch and that's the truth. Broner was never a threat to Pacquiao by anymeans let's stop the nonsense.

 

Don’t change the fact he was in the best shape of his life. In his own words u all give a ***** an opportunity to make a 100 mil.

Anyone who fights Pac or Floyd once they became big turned up at their best. Pac turned up his best ever to fight odlh.

 

Hopkins was in his best shape vs Taylor twice and lost twice smh I can go on and on. Anybody that really knows boxing knows Pacquiao pick broner cause he didn't think broner was a threat cause of the way broner fought in other 3 big fights which results in bad loses. Tell me when pac pick broner? Did anybody see broner as one of the top ww? I rest my case. I pick Pacquiao to easily beat Broner and I was easily right. It was the easily prediction.

 

Again, what is your point?

This thread isn't about whether Broner could actually beat Pac. broner could have fought Pac when he was 20, 25, 11, it doesnt matter.

Point is, Broner probably turned up his best shape ever and more motivated ever for this fight. So Pac arguably fought the best version.

 

Broner, his team, and every single person who saw him in camp said that he was in the best shape of his life, had the best training camp of his life, was the most serious about a fight that he's ever been, and was the hungriest he'd ever been in his career. Broner knew that a win over Pac would put him in serious bargaining position for any fights going forward. It was his biggest break. Let's not pretend!

 

LOL Then you should never talk about boxing ever again if you think Pacquiao fought the best version of broner lol stop it.

 

Lol, how does anything you said in this nonsensical post make a point that Garcia, Maidana and Porter had MORE impressive wins that Pacquaio. Go back to bed fool! haha

Listen, no question Broner was in better condition, more focused and took this challenge more seriously than he did any of the other 3.

The fact that Pacquiao was almost a decade older than all three of Broners other conquerors make this win so much more impressive.

 

Lets pretend broner was still at his best and never had other 3 big loses badly. Only biased, bandwagon Pacquiao fans think Pacquiao easily beat the great broner who in their words at his best lolol. Did I forgot to mention I pick Pacquiao to easily beat broner in which that's one of the easily prediction?

 

Before that fight I pick a 40 year old Pacquiao to easily beat Broner but I'm the fool? Does that make any damn sense? Broner wasnt more focused when he fought Pacquiao stop it. Broner was there basically to survive because he was looking for a huge payday hes receiving in which is why broner was in great shape in which he wont be tired of running in the latter rounds? Ever thought about that? You biased bandwagon Pacquiao fans are something else smh.

 

You just dont get it, maybe you're a bit slow. If I'm fighting my little bro who's 10. Do you think he was a tougher fight for me when he was 4, 5 or 10? The answer is 10. Could a 4, 5, 10 year old beat a grown ass man? No. But thats besides that point, you're still fighting the best version regardless. Bit slow today?

You can argue that it wasn't the best Broner, possibly, I doubt it, I think it was the best Broner. But your argument that you easily predicted Pac wins holds no value. First off, the best version of the opponent is not decided on odds, second, Pac was only 1-2 favourite. Broner was just as much an underdog against Pac as Pac was against mayweather. Does that mean Mayweather gets 0 credit for that win because he was the favourite? lol.

 

Broner was there again to survive. He didnt want to take a chance cause hes afraid of likely being stopped. He was there to survive. Getting that huge payday is what broner wants and doesn't care about getting another lose as long as he doesn't get stopped. I knew this will happen and I was right.

 

^^^I'm slow as you say but I pick Pacquiao to easily beat broner in which I was......right? And damn is that mean I'm alot smarter then the other ppl that actually pick broner? But but but I'm slow? Is your brain on vacation? That wasnt the best version of broner when he fought Pacquiao. <<<<Anybody that really knows boxing should know that.