I'm not as knowledeable as I should be on the Featherweights, but I'll give it a go... 1. Willie Pep 2. Sandy Saddler 3. Abe Attell 4. Terry McGovern 5. Freddie Miller 6. Vincente Saldivar 7. Henry Armstrong 8. Johnny Kilbane 9. Salvatore Sanchez T. Kid Chocolate. Honorable Mention but not in my top 10 (Alphabetical); Alexis Arguello, George Dixon, Jem Driscoll, John Manuel Marquez, Eusebio Pedroza.
When you were posting here as Ra's I got fed up trying to decipher your content and eventually gave up ,I'm not going to attempt it again.No matter how many correct you, and how many times they do so, nothing,, absolutely nothing will ever stop you repeating the same farcically slanted BS over and over again.As it is my thread I felt obliged to respond to you.I have done so, and once is enough.I'm not going to do so again.
Salvador Sanchez would have given anyone a tough figt at feather and may well have been the best ever at the weight, Arguello was probably on the same level if not better, Pep would have given those two a run for their money, Saddler beat Pep, Barrera was an amazing counter puncher but got dismantled by Manny so got to throw Pac`s name in the mix, however I think Loma would have beaten all of them, that`s my top six the next four names are pretty interchangeable.
You're right! I was struggling near the end of that list, and I entered Kilbane as "Honorable Mention" in error. I fixed my post. Thanks!
Perhaps the WORST post I have ever read on these boards. And I have been on these boards for years. Pure garbage. You are now on ignore.
I know, but was his only great win there (where Pacquio got counted). Barrera had dominat vicotries over Hamed, Morales, Tapia, Ayala (stopped him in opposite to Morales) among others.
Well I know he could be your grandchild, so you feel to protect all the nonsense he spread out here and like to ignore the contend. But you should recognize, he started the dispute with me, with complaining about my list with something what you abolute trash and not true... I made no particular order, but tiers, there are in the last one 4 or 5 boxers, as most users here reckomand this instead of a ranking... So to argue when 4 boxers are possible top 10 means that neither is in it, is just offensive and to get an argument with me! I intentional didn't cricized his lists here before, because I don't appreciate his postings at all and think he has no clue about boxing.
Certainly sounds like him. I will never know for certain, though, as I immediately put him on ignore.